Matching Items (115)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

41104-Thumbnail Image.png
DescriptionBooklet with description of the Grand Canyon. Circa 1915.
41157-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1926-04-02
DescriptionGrand Canyon National Park General Regulations.
41487-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1928-07-31
Description

Handwritten cover titled, "Nature Notes of Grand Canyon, Polyphemus Moth, Female, Found at Grand Canyon, 5 July 1928, Vol. 3 - No. 2." Cover includes a drawing of the moth.

41488-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1929-02-28
DescriptionMonthly bulletin, black and white, describing the natural history and scientific features of Grand Canyon National Park. This volume is dedicated in memoriam to Glen E. Sturdevant, park naturalist, and Fred Johnson, park ranger, who drowned while collecting specimens in the park.
41489-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1927-08-31
DescriptionMonthly bulletin, black and white, describing the natural history and scientific features of Grand Canyon National Park with cover drawing of fern bush.
41490-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1930
Description

Typescript report, black and white, describing the birds of Grand Canyon National Park with cover drawing of a bald eagle.

41491-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1929
Description

Typescript report, black and white, describing the mammals of Grand Canyon National Park with cover drawing of a bighorn sheep.

41501-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1940
DescriptionGuide Leaflet No. 3 detailing the west rim drive in the Grand Canyon.
41502-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1933
DescriptionGuide Leaflet No. 1 detailing the desert view drive of the Grand Canyon.
67439-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1981
Description

Argues that the canons of evidence that apply to artifactual evidence of prehistoric behavior patterns are sometimes distinct from those that apply to non-artifactual evidence, and the logic and archaeological value of the latter is not less simply because it is different. The essay is intended to instruct and sensitise

Argues that the canons of evidence that apply to artifactual evidence of prehistoric behavior patterns are sometimes distinct from those that apply to non-artifactual evidence, and the logic and archaeological value of the latter is not less simply because it is different. The essay is intended to instruct and sensitise archaeologists to this issue as much as it is to allay concern that the pollen evidence for Archaic maize cultivation at the Koster site may not be credible. 49 p. Also see Schoenwetter 1994