Matching Items (26)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

110818-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsTempe State Teachers College (Publisher)
Created1929-09-20
110819-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsTempe State Teachers College (Publisher)
Created1929-10-03
110820-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsTempe State Teachers College (Publisher)
Created1929-10-17
110821-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsTempe State Teachers College (Publisher)
Created1929-10-31
110822-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsTempe State Teachers College (Publisher)
Created1929-11-16
110823-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsTempe State Teachers College (Publisher)
Created1929-12-13
110824-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsTempe State Teachers College (Publisher)
Created1929-12-20
3807-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsDaniels, Mabel W. (Composer, Lyricist) / G. Schirmer, Inc. (Publisher)
Created1915
68332-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2014-10
Description

Report takes a look at the pros and cons of three propositions that will be on the November 2014 ballot.
* Prop 122: a constitutional amendment to allow the Legislature to ignore any federal law or action they think is unconstitutional.
* Prop 304: would increase legislator's salaries to $35,000/year.
* Prop 303:

Report takes a look at the pros and cons of three propositions that will be on the November 2014 ballot.
* Prop 122: a constitutional amendment to allow the Legislature to ignore any federal law or action they think is unconstitutional.
* Prop 304: would increase legislator's salaries to $35,000/year.
* Prop 303: would permit a manufacturer to give or sell investigational drugs, biological products, and medical devices to terminally ill patients even though the FDA has not cleared them for general use.

68338-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2014-03
Description

Dark money. The name itself carries ominous undertones, undertones that critics of this relatively new campaign-finance phenomenon claim reflect a genuine threat to democracy. Its defenders, on the other hand, argue that the dark money approach to funding political campaigns is merely an extension of Americans’ basic right to free

Dark money. The name itself carries ominous undertones, undertones that critics of this relatively new campaign-finance phenomenon claim reflect a genuine threat to democracy. Its defenders, on the other hand, argue that the dark money approach to funding political campaigns is merely an extension of Americans’ basic right to free speech. In other words, the issues at hand could hardly be more profound.