Matching Items (16)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

89442-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHunting, Dan (Contributor) / Gilmore, Taylor (Contributor) / Rex, Tom (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / L. William Seidman Research Institute (Contributor) / Center for Competitiveness and Prosperity Research (Contributor)
Created2019-05-01
Description

Mexico is Arizona’s No. 1 trading partner with over $15 billion in trade annually. The bulk of Arizona’s international commerce is with Sonora, the immediate neighbor to the south, but there are other potential economic opportunities worth exploring across Mexico. Here the focus is on Guanajuato, one of Mexico’s most

Mexico is Arizona’s No. 1 trading partner with over $15 billion in trade annually. The bulk of Arizona’s international commerce is with Sonora, the immediate neighbor to the south, but there are other potential economic opportunities worth exploring across Mexico. Here the focus is on Guanajuato, one of Mexico’s most economically advanced states with robust international trading ties. Watts College of Public Service and Community Solutions and Morrison Institute for Public Policy at Arizona State University researched the potential for enhanced economic ties between Arizona and Guanajuato, a state and capital city by the same name located in Central Mexico, 227 miles northwest of Mexico City and about 1,100 miles southeast of Phoenix. Watts College and Morrison Institute partnered with the L. William Seidman Research Institute at ASU’s W.P. Carey School of Business to produce a detailed economic profile of Guanajuato in order to guide ongoing and future exploration of expanded trade with Arizona.

3245-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsGlatt, Abe (Composer) / Bard, Ben (Lyricist) / Harry Von Tilzer Music Pub. Co. (Publisher)
Created1917
5518-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHarris, Will J., 1886-1967 (Composer) / Robinson, Harry I. (Composer) / Manoloff, Nick (Arranger) / Will Rossiter (Publisher)
Created1908
41819-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHoffman, Dennis (Author) / Rex, Tom (Author)
Created2009-02
Description

The state government general fund shortfall in the next fiscal year is projected to be $2.4 billion. A projected shortfall of $1.6 billion will need to be closed through spending reductions and/or revenue enhancements. The Legislature has focused on reductions in funding to state agencies. However demand does not decline

The state government general fund shortfall in the next fiscal year is projected to be $2.4 billion. A projected shortfall of $1.6 billion will need to be closed through spending reductions and/or revenue enhancements. The Legislature has focused on reductions in funding to state agencies. However demand does not decline for most public-sector services during a recession. Spending reductions by governments during recessions also worsen economic conditions. State spending cuts would worsen and lengthen the economic recession. The negative economic effects from a personal tax increase would be less than those of a governmental spending decrease. The demand for university services also does not drop during recessions. Any reduction in funding for universities will have a negative and direct effect. A substantial decrease in state government funding for universities will have negative consequences beyond these short-term effects. Any action--such as budget cuts--that undermines the success of the state's universities also impairs the state's economy.

41814-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHoffman, Dennis (Author) / Rex, Tom (Author) / Center for Competitiveness and Prosperity Research (Contributor)
Created2014-10
Description

This paper examines Arizona State University (ASU) graduates employed in Arizona. Approximately 207,000 ASU graduates were working in Arizona in 2012. The aggregate earnings of the ASU graduates were around $11.4 billion. These individuals contributed about $819 million in state taxes.

41809-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHoffman, Dennis (Author) / Rex, Tom (Author) / Center for Competitiveness and Prosperity Research (Contributor)
Created2008-06
Description

The initial $1.4 billion construction investment results in an immediate addition of $828 million to GSP and $700 million in labor income after controlling for resource and material acquisition from out-of-state sources. The in-state activity induces additional GSP generation of $1.1 billion and $711 million in labor income as the

The initial $1.4 billion construction investment results in an immediate addition of $828 million to GSP and $700 million in labor income after controlling for resource and material acquisition from out-of-state sources. The in-state activity induces additional GSP generation of $1.1 billion and $711 million in labor income as the direct effects ripple through the Arizona economy.