Matching Items (82)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

89722-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHunting, Dan (Contributor) / Reilly, Thom (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2016-05-01
Description
The decision about how to vote on Proposition 123 hinges on complex issues of education and state trust land finances. Morrison Institute has assembled a guide to some of the most important points to consider before you complete your ballot. Proposition 124 would amend the Arizona Constitution to create an exception

The decision about how to vote on Proposition 123 hinges on complex issues of education and state trust land finances. Morrison Institute has assembled a guide to some of the most important points to consider before you complete your ballot. Proposition 124 would amend the Arizona Constitution to create an exception to the current prohibition against diminishing or impairing public retirement systems benefits by allowing adjustments to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS).
89723-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsReilly, Thom (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2016-04-01
DescriptionUnderstanding Arizona's Propositions: 2016 Prop 124 – Changes to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSRS) Proposition 124 would amend the Arizona Constitution to create an exception to the current prohibition against diminishing or impairing public retirement systems benefits by allowing adjustments to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS).
89724-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2016-05-01
Description
In the wake of the 2016 Presidential Preference Election primary, where voters in Maricopa County stood in line for hours in many cases to cast a ballot in already-decided races and for independents provincial ballots that wouldn't count anyway, Arizonans continue to seek to have a larger and direct voice

In the wake of the 2016 Presidential Preference Election primary, where voters in Maricopa County stood in line for hours in many cases to cast a ballot in already-decided races and for independents provincial ballots that wouldn't count anyway, Arizonans continue to seek to have a larger and direct voice in government. In Building and Rebuilding An Election System in Arizona: Where We've Been, Where We're Going, Morrison Institute Senior Research Fellow David Berman examines Arizona's historical, recent and ongoing pursuit of "a new kind of politics" via everything from election reform to term limits to ballot propositions.
89725-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsM. Milem, Jeffry (Contributor) / G. Salazar, Karina (Contributor) / Bryan, W. Patrick (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2016-03-01
Description
The Arizona Minority Education Policy Analysis Center (AMEPAC) is a policy center of the Arizona Commission for Postsecondary Education. Through studies, AMEPAC’s mission is to stimulate constructive statewide discussion and debate about improving Arizona minority students’ early awareness, access, and achievement throughout the educational attainment process. Our vision is that

The Arizona Minority Education Policy Analysis Center (AMEPAC) is a policy center of the Arizona Commission for Postsecondary Education. Through studies, AMEPAC’s mission is to stimulate constructive statewide discussion and debate about improving Arizona minority students’ early awareness, access, and achievement throughout the educational attainment process. Our vision is that all Arizona students succeed in higher education as a result of quality research that shapes policy on critical issues. AMEPAC is proud to provide policymakers, educators, and the public with this 6th edition of the Minority Student Progress Report titled The Transformation Continues: Minority Student Progress Report 2016. The report provides a current “snapshot” of the educational achievement of minority students in Arizona, from pre-k through postsecondary education. In addition, trend analyses of key educational indicators are also provided to give readers a sense of how the status of minority education in Arizona has changed over time.
89726-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsManning, Linda (Contributor) / Hunting, Dan (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2016-02-01
Description
There are nearly 214,000 people between the ages of 16 and 24 in metropolitan Los Angeles who are neither working nor in school. These “Opportunity Youth” (OY) present a staggering challenge to the area in terms of lost wages and burden of social services alone. The number of OY has

There are nearly 214,000 people between the ages of 16 and 24 in metropolitan Los Angeles who are neither working nor in school. These “Opportunity Youth” (OY) present a staggering challenge to the area in terms of lost wages and burden of social services alone. The number of OY has decreased steadily since the end of the recession. However, in 2014, OY were more White, more educated, more likely to speak English in the home and more likely be on food stamps than in previous years. This demographic shift implicates a larger portion of those who are not traditionally considered “at risk”; a group that has historically not received much support. Opportunity Youth in Los Angeles impose an estimated lifetime burden on taxpayers of $43.2 billion and a lifetime social burden of $129.3 billion. Nationally, the 5.5 million Opportunity Youth have a potential taxpayer burden of $1.30 trillion and an aggregate social burden of $3.87 trillion. Figures like this signal a clear need for action.
89727-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHart, Bill (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / Children's Action Alliance (Contributor)
Created2016-01-01
DescriptionIn partnership with the Children’s Action Alliance, Morrison Institute recently completed an 18-page research report on the negative effects of the incarceration of delinquent youths in Arizona, and the benefits of locally–based services in the youths’ home communities.
89728-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMcFadden, Erica Skogebo (Contributor) / Fisher, Kim W. (Contributor) / Eun Lee, Sang (Contributor) / Kovacs, Melissa (Contributor) / Barajas, Maria (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / Arizona Developmental Disabilities Planning Council (Contributor)
Created2016-01-01
DescriptionCommissioned by the Arizona Developmental Disabilities Planning Council, Morrison Institute for Public Policy recently completed a year-long comprehensive state review of services, strengths, barriers, and unmet needs for people with developmental disabilities (DD) and their families.
89729-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMcFadden, Erica S. (Contributor) / Daughtery, David (Contributor) / Gastil, John (Contributor) / Knobloch, Katherine (Contributor) / Schugurensky, Daniel (Contributor) / Garcia, Joseph (Contributor) / Haque, Avanti (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2015-12-01
Description
In September 2014 ASU’s Morrison Institute for Public Policy conducted the state’s first Citizens Initiative Review (CIR). MI invited 20 participants to deliberate for 3½ days over a pension reform measure on the city ballot to develop a factually vetted, one-page Citizens’ Statement with the pros and cons of the

In September 2014 ASU’s Morrison Institute for Public Policy conducted the state’s first Citizens Initiative Review (CIR). MI invited 20 participants to deliberate for 3½ days over a pension reform measure on the city ballot to develop a factually vetted, one-page Citizens’ Statement with the pros and cons of the initiative. The goal of the CIR is to help other voters make a more informed decision on specific initiatives before going to the ballot box. This report, funded by the Kettering Foundation, analyzes CIR participant interviews conducted six weeks and six months later to show how values, beliefs, and behaviors towards democratic habits, public action, and community engagement may have been changed through their involvement, if at all. The report concludes with lessons learned and the contributions of the CIR to creating a more democratic Arizona.
89564-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsReilly, Thom (Contributor) / Whitsett, Andrea (Contributor) / Garcia, Joseph (Contributor) / Hart, William (Contributor) / McWhortor, Patrick (Contributor) / Reiss, Bonnie (Contributor) / Grose, Christian (Contributor) / Cornelius, Michelle (Contributor) / Giannaros, S. Jason (Contributor) / Salit, Jacqueline (Contributor) / Stewart, Cathy (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / Schwarzenegger Institute for State and Global Policy (Contributor) / Independentvoting.org (Contributor)
Created2017-10-01
Description

Politics, elections and governance in the United States are largely viewed through the lens of a two-party power structure of Republicans and Democrats. However, a distinct but ill-defined group of voters is quietly becoming a force that no longer can be ignored. Independent voters are increasingly determining winners and losers

Politics, elections and governance in the United States are largely viewed through the lens of a two-party power structure of Republicans and Democrats. However, a distinct but ill-defined group of voters is quietly becoming a force that no longer can be ignored. Independent voters are increasingly determining winners and losers in election contests throughout the country and the number of Americans who call themselves independents is on the rise. However surprisingly little is known about the America’s independent voters. Morrison Institute for Public Policy at Arizona State University and the Schwarzenegger Institute for State and Global Policy have teamed up with one another and Independentvoting.org to examine the independent voter phenomenon and the impact that it is having on the American political landscape. Their findings have been outlined in the briefing paper Gamechangers?: Independent Voters May Rewrite the Political Playbook.

89565-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHart, Bill (Contributor) / Manning, Linda (Contributor) / Shoemaker, John A. (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2015-08-01
Description

Early childhood is a critical period for every infant. Raising healthy, happy children is a challenge for every parent. Helping families navigate the first few years of life is the goal of home visiting, a statewide network of free programs that promotes family health and education from pregnancy through early

Early childhood is a critical period for every infant. Raising healthy, happy children is a challenge for every parent. Helping families navigate the first few years of life is the goal of home visiting, a statewide network of free programs that promotes family health and education from pregnancy through early childhood. The network provides nurses, social workers and other professionals to answer expectant and new parents’ questions about such topics as nutrition, health and discipline – in the privacy of their own home.