Matching Items (74)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

89554-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsDaughtery, David (Contributor) / Garcia, Joseph (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2018-06-01
Description

While many potential voters care deeply about local and state issues, 45 percent of Arizona citizens of voting-age population did not vote in the last election, according to a report by Morrison Institute for Public Policy. To address this voter crisis, Arizona Clean Elections commissioned this report, the first in

While many potential voters care deeply about local and state issues, 45 percent of Arizona citizens of voting-age population did not vote in the last election, according to a report by Morrison Institute for Public Policy. To address this voter crisis, Arizona Clean Elections commissioned this report, the first in a series, to identify the reasons why only a little more than half of eligible voters actually are casting ballots in Arizona, as well as a first-of-its-kind knowledge bank of information on Arizona government to ensure that voters can vote in an informed manner.

89729-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMcFadden, Erica S. (Contributor) / Daughtery, David (Contributor) / Gastil, John (Contributor) / Knobloch, Katherine (Contributor) / Schugurensky, Daniel (Contributor) / Garcia, Joseph (Contributor) / Haque, Avanti (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2015-12-01
Description
In September 2014 ASU’s Morrison Institute for Public Policy conducted the state’s first Citizens Initiative Review (CIR). MI invited 20 participants to deliberate for 3½ days over a pension reform measure on the city ballot to develop a factually vetted, one-page Citizens’ Statement with the pros and cons of the

In September 2014 ASU’s Morrison Institute for Public Policy conducted the state’s first Citizens Initiative Review (CIR). MI invited 20 participants to deliberate for 3½ days over a pension reform measure on the city ballot to develop a factually vetted, one-page Citizens’ Statement with the pros and cons of the initiative. The goal of the CIR is to help other voters make a more informed decision on specific initiatives before going to the ballot box. This report, funded by the Kettering Foundation, analyzes CIR participant interviews conducted six weeks and six months later to show how values, beliefs, and behaviors towards democratic habits, public action, and community engagement may have been changed through their involvement, if at all. The report concludes with lessons learned and the contributions of the CIR to creating a more democratic Arizona.
ContributorsQuintana, Erica (Contributor) / Sun, Jade (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2018-05-01
Description

From its inception, the “Spotlight on Arizona’s Kids” project was a different type of initiative undertaken by Morrison Institute for Public Policy and none more important – the safety and well-being of children whose lives intersect with the child welfare system. This multi-year project, funded by Arizona Community Foundation (ACF),

From its inception, the “Spotlight on Arizona’s Kids” project was a different type of initiative undertaken by Morrison Institute for Public Policy and none more important – the safety and well-being of children whose lives intersect with the child welfare system. This multi-year project, funded by Arizona Community Foundation (ACF), includes data and expertise provided by Arizona Department of Child Safety (DCS), along with input from national and local child welfare experts. To date, the project has produced five publications that examine the breadth and complexity of issues related to child neglect with the goal of informing effective policy in Arizona.

89464-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsQuintana, Erica (Contributor) / Sun, Jade (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / Arizona Community Foundation (Contributor)
Created2018-03-01
Description

This is the fourth in a series of briefs in which Morrison Institute for Public Policy will report on selected aspects of Arizona’s child welfare system. Morrison Institute’s first white paper discussed the less visible but more common side of child maltreatment: neglect. The second white paper examined family conditions

This is the fourth in a series of briefs in which Morrison Institute for Public Policy will report on selected aspects of Arizona’s child welfare system. Morrison Institute’s first white paper discussed the less visible but more common side of child maltreatment: neglect. The second white paper examined family conditions that can influence a family’s subtle “drift” towards unsafe situations that often correlate with neglect, as well as how different types of prevention might help interrupt the “drift into failure.” The third paper analyzed Arizona Department of Child Safety data to identify the prevalence of various types of neglect in Arizona reports. This paper highlights some key conclusions from the neglect analysis and identifies future areas for study and analysis as part of the Spotlight on Arizona’s Kids project. Future papers will research, analyze and discuss prevention services in Arizona and elsewhere, with an emphasis on best practices. These collective efforts are intended to help state leaders, child advocates and others discuss and identify the most-effective child abuse and neglect prevention strategies. Spotlight on Arizona’s Kids is funded by the Arizona Community Foundation

89283-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsWhitsett, Andrea (Contributor) / Gupta, Sapna (Contributor) / Hunting, Dan (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / Arizona Community Foundation (Contributor)
Created2013-11-01
Description

This year, Arizona Directions assesses the health of both ends of the P-20 spectrum: early childcare and education and the high school /postsecondary-to-industry nexus. Both are viewed through the lens of Arizona’s current competitive position and its trajectory through the broader economic landscape. How well does Arizona regulate, promote and

This year, Arizona Directions assesses the health of both ends of the P-20 spectrum: early childcare and education and the high school /postsecondary-to-industry nexus. Both are viewed through the lens of Arizona’s current competitive position and its trajectory through the broader economic landscape. How well does Arizona regulate, promote and ensure equitable access to quality early childcare and to programs that help children enter Kindergarten ready to learn? Does Arizona’s production of graduates and skilled workers align with current and projected industry needs? In other words, are we setting our children up to succeed in the new global economy? At the same time, are we creating a talent pool that will help Arizona stand out as the place to start and grow a business? Arizona Directions’ data-driven approach enables Arizonans to step back and examine the evidence without the distraction of clashing political rhetoric. The report is designed to create a common reference point for civil discourse and post-partisan, collaborative approaches to improving Arizona’s competitiveness. Still, the data are merely the kindling. Many minds are needed to stoke the fire and convert its energy into real-world results.

96172-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsD'Alli, Richard (Host) / Block, Michael K. (Interviewee) / Malatia, Torey (Reporter) / Nabhan, Gary Paul (Interviewee) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-04-21
DescriptionMichael Block Remote Interview (Corso); Nutrition/Hot Weather Package (D'Alli); Rare Plants Package (Cavanary). Segments on prison sentencing disparities caused by judicial discretion and the U.S. Sentencing Commission, heat-related nutrition recommendations, and imminent botanical extinction.
96177-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Bommersbach, Jana (Commentator) / Kunasek, Carl James, 1932- (Interviewee) / Malatia, Torey (Reporter) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-04-29
DescriptionSenator Carl J. Kunasek Remote Interview (Corso); Bommersbach Byline #5: Phoenix Skyline Package (Bommersbach); Wildlife Rehabilitation Package (Cavanary). Segments on a local failure to care for the chronically mentally ill, Bommersbach's Byline (the Phoenix skyline), and the need for wildlife rehabilitation programs due to wildlife injuries caused by urban development.
96181-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Malatia, Torey (Reporter) / Crowe, Barbara J. (Interviewee) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-05-05
DescriptionEdgar Ball and Don Harris Remote Interview (Corso); Music Therapy Package (Britton). Segments on the domestic copper industry and music therapy treatment programs.
96187-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Anderson, Joseph P. (Interviewee) / Malatia, Torey (Reporter) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-05-14
DescriptionJoseph P. Anderson In-Studio Interview (Corso); Depression and the Elderly Package (D'Alli); Exotic Animal Behavior Package (Cavanary). Segments on the adjournment of the Arizona Legislature (final issues including AHCCCS-related topics), the North American Symposium on Depression (myths surrounding aging and depression), and zoo animal behavioral factors.
96194-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsMalatia, Torey (Host) / Bommersbach, Jana (Commentator) / Miller, Darrow L. (Interviewee) / Yarger, Larry C. (Interviewee) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-05-27
DescriptionJose Santiago and Amy Gittler In-Studio Interview (Corso); Bommersbach's Byline #9: Sanctuary Package (Durrenberger); Desert Center Package (Shelton). Segments on improvements to Arizona's mental health care system, Bommersbach's Byline (the Tucson Sanctuary Trial), and the Food for the Hungry program.