Matching Items (75)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

89554-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsDaughtery, David (Contributor) / Garcia, Joseph (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2018-06-01
Description

While many potential voters care deeply about local and state issues, 45 percent of Arizona citizens of voting-age population did not vote in the last election, according to a report by Morrison Institute for Public Policy. To address this voter crisis, Arizona Clean Elections commissioned this report, the first in

While many potential voters care deeply about local and state issues, 45 percent of Arizona citizens of voting-age population did not vote in the last election, according to a report by Morrison Institute for Public Policy. To address this voter crisis, Arizona Clean Elections commissioned this report, the first in a series, to identify the reasons why only a little more than half of eligible voters actually are casting ballots in Arizona, as well as a first-of-its-kind knowledge bank of information on Arizona government to ensure that voters can vote in an informed manner.

89729-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMcFadden, Erica S. (Contributor) / Daughtery, David (Contributor) / Gastil, John (Contributor) / Knobloch, Katherine (Contributor) / Schugurensky, Daniel (Contributor) / Garcia, Joseph (Contributor) / Haque, Avanti (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor)
Created2015-12-01
Description
In September 2014 ASU’s Morrison Institute for Public Policy conducted the state’s first Citizens Initiative Review (CIR). MI invited 20 participants to deliberate for 3½ days over a pension reform measure on the city ballot to develop a factually vetted, one-page Citizens’ Statement with the pros and cons of the

In September 2014 ASU’s Morrison Institute for Public Policy conducted the state’s first Citizens Initiative Review (CIR). MI invited 20 participants to deliberate for 3½ days over a pension reform measure on the city ballot to develop a factually vetted, one-page Citizens’ Statement with the pros and cons of the initiative. The goal of the CIR is to help other voters make a more informed decision on specific initiatives before going to the ballot box. This report, funded by the Kettering Foundation, analyzes CIR participant interviews conducted six weeks and six months later to show how values, beliefs, and behaviors towards democratic habits, public action, and community engagement may have been changed through their involvement, if at all. The report concludes with lessons learned and the contributions of the CIR to creating a more democratic Arizona.
89464-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsQuintana, Erica (Contributor) / Sun, Jade (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / Arizona Community Foundation (Contributor)
Created2018-03-01
Description

This is the fourth in a series of briefs in which Morrison Institute for Public Policy will report on selected aspects of Arizona’s child welfare system. Morrison Institute’s first white paper discussed the less visible but more common side of child maltreatment: neglect. The second white paper examined family conditions

This is the fourth in a series of briefs in which Morrison Institute for Public Policy will report on selected aspects of Arizona’s child welfare system. Morrison Institute’s first white paper discussed the less visible but more common side of child maltreatment: neglect. The second white paper examined family conditions that can influence a family’s subtle “drift” towards unsafe situations that often correlate with neglect, as well as how different types of prevention might help interrupt the “drift into failure.” The third paper analyzed Arizona Department of Child Safety data to identify the prevalence of various types of neglect in Arizona reports. This paper highlights some key conclusions from the neglect analysis and identifies future areas for study and analysis as part of the Spotlight on Arizona’s Kids project. Future papers will research, analyze and discuss prevention services in Arizona and elsewhere, with an emphasis on best practices. These collective efforts are intended to help state leaders, child advocates and others discuss and identify the most-effective child abuse and neglect prevention strategies. Spotlight on Arizona’s Kids is funded by the Arizona Community Foundation

89283-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsWhitsett, Andrea (Contributor) / Gupta, Sapna (Contributor) / Hunting, Dan (Contributor) / Morrison Institute of Public Policy (Contributor) / Arizona Community Foundation (Contributor)
Created2013-11-01
Description

This year, Arizona Directions assesses the health of both ends of the P-20 spectrum: early childcare and education and the high school /postsecondary-to-industry nexus. Both are viewed through the lens of Arizona’s current competitive position and its trajectory through the broader economic landscape. How well does Arizona regulate, promote and

This year, Arizona Directions assesses the health of both ends of the P-20 spectrum: early childcare and education and the high school /postsecondary-to-industry nexus. Both are viewed through the lens of Arizona’s current competitive position and its trajectory through the broader economic landscape. How well does Arizona regulate, promote and ensure equitable access to quality early childcare and to programs that help children enter Kindergarten ready to learn? Does Arizona’s production of graduates and skilled workers align with current and projected industry needs? In other words, are we setting our children up to succeed in the new global economy? At the same time, are we creating a talent pool that will help Arizona stand out as the place to start and grow a business? Arizona Directions’ data-driven approach enables Arizonans to step back and examine the evidence without the distraction of clashing political rhetoric. The report is designed to create a common reference point for civil discourse and post-partisan, collaborative approaches to improving Arizona’s competitiveness. Still, the data are merely the kindling. Many minds are needed to stoke the fire and convert its energy into real-world results.

96175-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsJennings, Max (Panelist) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Bommersbach, Jana (Panelist) / Sommer, Anthony (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-04-25
Description
Friday Edition. Panelists discuss the ongoing issues keeping the Arizona Legislature in session (including a referendum petition that would place the Gosnell land swap issue in the hands of voters, abortion laws, teacher's rights, and artificial lakes). Panelists include Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix

Friday Edition. Panelists discuss the ongoing issues keeping the Arizona Legislature in session (including a referendum petition that would place the Gosnell land swap issue in the hands of voters, abortion laws, teacher's rights, and artificial lakes). Panelists include Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette; Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Mesa Tribune; Anthony Sommer, Statehouse Reporter, Phoenix Gazette.
96183-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Jennings, Max (Interviewee) / Gohlke, Mary (Interviewee) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-05-08
DescriptionPhilip MacDonnell and Donna Pickering In-Studio Interview (Corso); Carman Brooks and Max Jennings In-Studio Interview (Corso). Segments on Arizona Legislature issues (liability insurance, bar owner liability) and the death of heart/lung transplant recipient Mary Gohlke.
96193-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Bommersbach, Jana (Panelist) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-05-23
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss Arizona's Martin Luther King Jr. Day, gubernatorial race updates, and two land swaps. Panelists include Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Mesa Tribune; Don Harris, Political and Labor Writer, Arizona Republic; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette.
96197-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-05-30
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss the Republican gubernatorial primary and the Congressional District 1 GOP primary. Panelists include John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette; Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Mesa Tribune; Don Harris, Political and Labor Writer, Arizona Republic.
96212-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Bommersbach, Jana (Panelist) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-06-20
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss legal proceedings against County Attorney Tom Collins, the Gosnell land swap, and a law that would guarantee access to AZP Group's records. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Mesa Tribune; Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; Rich Robertson, City Editor, Arizona Republic.
95991-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Sommer, Anthony (Panelist) / Bommersbach, Jana (Panelist) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1985-05-31
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss sheriff's office drug busts, police department civilian review boards, utility rate increases, and city planning issues. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Mesa Tribune; Anthony Sommer, Statehouse Reporter, Phoenix Gazette; Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times.