Filtering by
- All Subjects: Arizona State University -- Curricula -- Catalogs
- All Subjects: Sonoran Desert
- Creators: Arizona State University. Office of the University Provost
- Creators: Muro, Mark
This document is a supplement to the Academic Catalog Archive 2022-2023 published in November 2022. It is the record of policies and programs that experienced changes since the publication of the Academic Catalog Archive 2022-2023. It also contains additional policies that were not provided within the Academic Catalog Archive 2022-2023 because information was unavailable at the time of publication.
This document is an archival record of ASU’s instructional faculty. Faculty listed are involved in undergraduate and graduate instruction and research for the 2022-2023 academic year. Each individual’s name and title are followed by the current department. In addition, the type of terminal degree held, issuing institution and date of conferral are listed.
This document provides an archival record of the course catalog offered during the 2022-2023 academic year.
The documents that comprise the ASU Academic Catalog as well as specific regulations and policies for students attending the ASU at Los Angles location.
This document provides an archival record of the academic programs offered during the 2023-2024 academic year. It is a printable option of the online catalog for accreditation organizations, agencies and university offices for data collection, evaluation purposes and referencing. The information and links presented in this archive may no longer be accurate. For current catalog information, refer to the online version of the academic catalog.
Corrections or additions to the Academic Catalog Archive 2023-2024 program information and major maps, as of August 2023, may be provided in a future addendum. For inquiries or questions, please contact academic.catalog@asu.edu.
This document provides an archival record of the academic programs offered during the 2023-2024 academic year in California. It is a printable option of the online catalog for accreditation organizations, agencies and university offices for data collection, evaluation purposes and referencing. The information and links presented in this archive may no longer be accurate. For full current catalog information, refer to the online version of the academic catalog.
Corrections or additions to the Academic Catalog Archive - California 2023-2024 program information and major maps, as of August 2023, may be provided in a future addendum. For inquiries or questions, please contact academic.catalog@asu.edu.
A series of 51 individual “stakeholder” interviews and two focus groups conducted with members of the Pima County business community in fall, 2001, documented significantly divided opinion about the likely economic impacts of the county’s Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP). The results of the stakeholder inquiries were striking. Only one major finding reflected consensus, while several others revealed sharp differences of opinion in the business community about the potential economic impacts of the SDCP and associated initiatives.
In February of 1998, the Pima County Board of Supervisors launched what has evolved into the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP) -- a comprehensive effort to protect the Sonoran Desert, guide growth and rationalize land development in the metropolitan Tucson region. Proponents of this planning process maintained that the project would reconcile conflicts between human activities and conservation, providing benefits for both wildlife and economic development. Critics, however, have increasingly alleged that implementing such an initiative will adversely affect land and housing markets, increase taxes and create problems of housing affordability. Over time a pressing need has consequently grown for objective information about the possible fiscal and economic impacts of the conservation programs being assembled by Pima County. This report addresses that need. It is a tool in the form of an impartial framework for assessment that government officials, environmentalists, business people and the general public can use for debate and decision-making.