Matching Items (13)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

96808-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1989-01-13
Description
Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss Governor Mofford's first State of the State address, Chief Justice Frank Gordon's request to address the Legislature, State Senator Carolyn Walker's comments about a racist press, and an important Republican election in Maricopa County. Panelists include Mark Flatten, Political Reporter, Scottsdale Progress; John Kolbe, Political

Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss Governor Mofford's first State of the State address, Chief Justice Frank Gordon's request to address the Legislature, State Senator Carolyn Walker's comments about a racist press, and an important Republican election in Maricopa County. Panelists include Mark Flatten, Political Reporter, Scottsdale Progress; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette; Doug MacEachern, Political Columnist, Tribune Newspapers.
97046-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Kammer, Jerry, 1949- (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1991-11-08
DescriptionFriday Edition. Panelists discuss an update on Charles Keating's trial, the adjournment of the Arizona Legislature's special session on campaign and election reform, and the Maricopa County bond election. Panelists include John Kolbe, Mark Flatten, and Jerry Kammer.
96724-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1988-09-09
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss the upcoming primary election (voter turnout, political attacks, and a Maricopa County endorsement). Panelists include Don Harris, Political and Labor Writer, Arizona Republic; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette; Doug MacEachern, Columnist, Tribune Newspaper.
96480-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsBommersbach, Jana (Panelist) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1987-08-21
Description
Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss efforts to recall Governor Mecham ("proof" linking the Democratic party with the movement), a judge's ruling on parental consent for a minor's abortion, the proposed Rio Salado Project, and the redistricting of the Maricopa County supervisory district. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers;

Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss efforts to recall Governor Mecham ("proof" linking the Democratic party with the movement), a judge's ruling on parental consent for a minor's abortion, the proposed Rio Salado Project, and the redistricting of the Maricopa County supervisory district. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers; Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette.
42081-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsFigueroa, Holly L. (Author) / Totura, Christine (Author) / Brien, Spencer (Author) / Wolfersteig, Wendy (Author) / RTI International (Publisher)
Created2014-06
Description

The Maricopa County Department of Public Health and the Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center at Arizona State University initiated an evaluation of ASU’s Tobacco-Free Campus policy, which went into effect on August 1, 2013. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the impacts of this policy on the ASU community

The Maricopa County Department of Public Health and the Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center at Arizona State University initiated an evaluation of ASU’s Tobacco-Free Campus policy, which went into effect on August 1, 2013. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the impacts of this policy on the ASU community and environment. This report summarizes tobacco consumption patterns, norms and perceptions surrounding tobacco use, tobacco litter on campus, and overall benefits of a tobacco-free campus both before and after policy implementation.

42090-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsFigueroa, Holly L. (Author) / Lynch, Ashley (Author) / Totura, Christine (Author) / Wolfersteig, Wendy (Author) / RTI International (Publisher)
Created2014-06
Description

In 2006, the Smoke-Free Arizona Act outlawed smoking within most enclosed public spaces and places of employment primarily to reduce the exposure of individuals to harmful secondhand smoke. The purpose of the Maricopa County Smoke-Free Parks Policy Assessment is three-fold: 1) to evaluate the extent and health impact of tobacco

In 2006, the Smoke-Free Arizona Act outlawed smoking within most enclosed public spaces and places of employment primarily to reduce the exposure of individuals to harmful secondhand smoke. The purpose of the Maricopa County Smoke-Free Parks Policy Assessment is three-fold: 1) to evaluate the extent and health impact of tobacco usage in public parks; 2) analyze smoke-free parks policies that have been proposed in cities, counties, and states nationwide; and 3) to assess the feasibility of introducing and implementing similar policies in Arizona, and in Maricopa County in particular.

42466-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2007-05
Description

The Old U.S. Highway 80 Area Plan is an entirely new plan which removes portions of the State Route 85 Area Plan and the Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan. It is important to note that this Plan is not a document that represents final buildout as many municipal general plans typically do.

The Old U.S. Highway 80 Area Plan is an entirely new plan which removes portions of the State Route 85 Area Plan and the Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan. It is important to note that this Plan is not a document that represents final buildout as many municipal general plans typically do. Rather, it prepares for and accommodates growth over the next ten to fifteen years, but will be reexamined and updated as necessary to reflect current conditions and changes. While not a complete solution, the Plan helps address the effects of growth and development by enhancing cooperation between government agencies, citizens, and other affected interests, and by considering regional implications.

42469-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1992-01-21
Description

This plan was originally adopted on May 22, 1989, and an updated version was adopted on November 5, 1990. This current edition has been updated to reflect changing growth patterns, population projections, annexations and other changes to the planning area since its first adoption.

42470-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2005
Description

It is important to note that the Rio Verde Foothills Area Plan is not a document that represents ultimate buildout as many municipal general plans typically do. Rather, it prepares for and accommodates growth over the next ten to fifteen years, but will be reexamined and updated periodically to reflect

It is important to note that the Rio Verde Foothills Area Plan is not a document that represents ultimate buildout as many municipal general plans typically do. Rather, it prepares for and accommodates growth over the next ten to fifteen years, but will be reexamined and updated periodically to reflect current conditions and changes. While not a complete solution, the Rio Verde Foothills Area Plan helps address the effects of growth and development by enhancing cooperation between government agencies, citizens, and other affected interests, and by considering regional implications.

42471-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2006-03
Description

It is likely that urban growth is occurring and will occur along the McMicken Dam Scenic Corridor, which will present residents and stakeholders with important changes. Mitigating the potential impacts of these changes will continue to be a high priority for Maricopa County. Because these guidelines reflect the recommendations of

It is likely that urban growth is occurring and will occur along the McMicken Dam Scenic Corridor, which will present residents and stakeholders with important changes. Mitigating the potential impacts of these changes will continue to be a high priority for Maricopa County. Because these guidelines reflect the recommendations of residents and other stakeholders, they provide a unique opportunity for these residents and stakeholders to participate in the future growth and development of their area.