Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

96655-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1988-05-27
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss the criminal trial of the Mecham brothers, Governor Mofford's problems, political wrangling at the capitol, and a Maricopa County felony child abuse case concerning mandatory birth control. Pre-Mecham trial panelists include Sam Stanton, Jack Lavelle, and Max Jennings.
96480-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsBommersbach, Jana (Panelist) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1987-08-21
Description
Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss efforts to recall Governor Mecham ("proof" linking the Democratic party with the movement), a judge's ruling on parental consent for a minor's abortion, the proposed Rio Salado Project, and the redistricting of the Maricopa County supervisory district. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers;

Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss efforts to recall Governor Mecham ("proof" linking the Democratic party with the movement), a judge's ruling on parental consent for a minor's abortion, the proposed Rio Salado Project, and the redistricting of the Maricopa County supervisory district. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers; Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette.
42814-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2012-09
Description

The purpose of this report is to provide a proof of concept for a different, alternative method for evaluating police agencies. Our method is couched in a comparative approach, which will allow agencies to compare their performance to other police agencies. This report assesses police performance through the perceptions and

The purpose of this report is to provide a proof of concept for a different, alternative method for evaluating police agencies. Our method is couched in a comparative approach, which will allow agencies to compare their performance to other police agencies. This report assesses police performance through the perceptions and experiences of recently booked arrestees. By comparing the perceptions and experiences of recently booked arrestees from different jurisdictions we can begin to contextualize results and observe differences that might serve as an early warning of a problem or serve as an indicator of success.