Filtering by
- All Subjects: Economic policy
- All Subjects: Aging
- All Subjects: Mental health services
- All Subjects: Education--Finance
- Creators: Morrison Institute for Public Policy
![68342-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68342-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=cxStACPI6kJX6oBf7WS_Eoi979FS0h20)
Arizona has grown rapidly over the years and our education system has grown in step with the population. But increasing the total budget for education doesn't mean that we have directed more resources to each student. The numbers show that Arizona has one of the lowest per-pupil funding rates in the country. Parties of one faction or another argue endlessly about which numbers to use in comparing Arizona to other states, or even whether such comparisons are possible. What is indisputable is that Arizona ranks in the bottom tier of states in both education spending and in student achievement and that we have made substantial cuts in our funding of both K-12 and higher education since the beginning of the Great Recession.
![68409-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68409-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=eKhp7fCI1nT505N.JOXxi0JvWlXjqTN_)
Some of Arizonans’ most common and destructive illnesses—those of the brain—are failing to receive adequate treatment due to a combination of modern governmental gridlock and a centuries-old philosophy that separates the mind from the body.
![68418-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68418-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=9ym6u1_RZskAi4raebgOIjras1mMD1zH)
This report follows The Coming of Age report produced in 2002 by some of the principals involved in this project, and published by St. Luke’s Health Initiatives. That research showed that Arizona had much to do to get ready for the baby boomer age wave. The results of Unlocking Resilience from new survey data, interviews, and secondary research indicates Arizona still has much to do to prepare for aging and must make concrete policy decisions about aging.
![68423-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68423-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=RZhkR0QPD.U_l5jEMzt2rmvJp2Njohsr)
Severe and widespread budget cuts in behavioral health and substance abuse services for lower-income Arizonans who don’t qualify for AHCCCS have already taken effect across the state. Even before these cuts were implemented, it was clear that the publicly-supported behavioral health system in our state was not adequately serving many Arizonans who needed mental health or substance use disorder treatment. This paper represents an effort by Arizona State University’s Centers for Applied Behavioral Health Policy and the Morrison Institute for Public Policy to promote and enrich Arizona’s public dialogue about these problems and potential solutions.
![68428-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68428-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=uY3jglFRhxYX_i_aiTuD5L2kQz_e8hbW)
Arizona’s public behavioral health care system, which serves some 150,000 mentally ill and vulnerable state residents, is wrestling with a number of urgent challenges. In addition to budget cuts resulting from the current economic crisis, and the demands of a 28-year-old class-action lawsuit, the system has been repeatedly criticized in several areas, including for inadequate staff, data, housing support, and crisis services. On July 22, a panel of professionals who play key roles in the system discussed these and other issues before some 300 behavioral health providers, supervisors, and policymakers at the annual Summer Institute hosted by Arizona State University’s Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy. This paper provides an abbreviated report of that discussion, which was partially designed and moderated by ASU’s Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
![68523-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68523-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=ztzVkB3ahqpW9XE0TbGPIPMmbQ.5wP1z)
In the spring of 1998, the Office of Workforce Development Policy (OWDP) of the Arizona Department of Commerce commissioned a statewide opinion poll to assess public attitudes toward the state’s plan for economic development as implemented through GSPED — the Governor’s Strategic Partnership for Economic Development. The poll was designed to assess both the public’s understanding of GSPED and their reactions to using the concept of industry clusters as a tool for organizing both economic and workforce development efforts.
One question posed by members of the Governors’ Council on Workforce Development Policy pertained
to whether polling results vary by urban versus rural residency. Specifically, the question was raised as to whether the responses of rural residents differ from those who live in urban areas. Therefore, at the request of the Council, results of the polling were analyzed in order to answer the question: Does urban versus rural residency affect respondents' answers? The answer to this question is, in short, No.
![68524-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68524-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=nRAnVPPZqkGnoiqt2x2ntMXTYv5X8bu0)
In the spring of 1998, the Office of Workforce Development Policy (OWDP) of the Arizona Department of Commerce commissioned a statewide opinion poll to assess public attitudes toward the state’s plan for economic development as implemented through GSPED — the Governor’s Strategic Partnership for Economic Development. The poll was designed to assess both the public’s understanding of GSPED and their reactions to using the concept of industry clusters as a tool for organizing both economic and workforce development efforts.
![68529-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68529-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=HvgtAhepkXGtawTcqM7v.BvVa8AqSVn4)
Aging affects all dimensions of our society, but none so much as health care. Thus, St. Luke’s Health Initiatives (SLHI) decided to dedicate part of its Arizona Health Futures program to exploring Arizona’s capacity to meet the health care demands of an aging population. SLHI asked the Arizona State University School of Public Affairs and Morrison Institute for Public Policy to collaborate on The Coming of Age to inform Arizona’s policy leaders and residents about these critical issues. The Coming of Age engaged demographers, economists, public policy analysts, human service and medical professionals and citizens. Through its research, the team developed a realistic picture of Arizona’s "capacity to care" for an elder population. The results of the research are presented in The Coming of Age: Aging, Health and Arizona’s Capacity to Care.
![68556-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68556-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=pFd7yQQXUJdDu3TYZ4rQoLpiGkczVCWL)
Fierce competition for workers is one of the top issues today in Arizona. Many people may be surprised to hear that anything related to the state’s economic situation is on a list of pressing issues. Arizona’s economy is and remains robust, the state is finding it difficult to supply workers in demand by industry. The result is a new but deep threat to our economic future. Businesses’ inability to find and retain the workers they need, where they will need them, may in fact be the spear that unexpectedly pierces the state’s prosperity.
![68499-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-09/68499-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=zY9z8FWOsMcq7g.koyg1nnYSuV5saw6h)
Nearly everyone is talking about sustainability. But what exactly does it mean—especially for Arizona? Morrison Institute and Arizona State University’s Global Institute of Sustainability answer that question and many more in this report.