Matching Items (4)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

Annual Report (Arizona Superior Court Adult Probation Department - Pima County)

ContributorsArizona. Superior Court (Pima County). Adult Probation Department (Author)
Created2001 to 2003
Description

In about 60% of the cases sentenced in Pima County, the offender will be placed on supervised probation for an average of three years. Protection of the community is always the primary consideration when determining a supervision program. To ensure long-term protection requires motivating the offender to change those factors…

In about 60% of the cases sentenced in Pima County, the offender will be placed on supervised probation for an average of three years. Protection of the community is always the primary consideration when determining a supervision program. To ensure long-term protection requires motivating the offender to change those factors that contributed to criminal behavior. Based on empirical research conducted by social scientists, certain dynamic factors are common to offenders and are targets for change.

Annual Impact Report

ContributorsPima County (Ariz.). Community Development and Neighborhood Conservation Department. Outside Agency Program (Author)
Created2010 to 2016
Description

The Pima County Outside Agency program provides funding to non‐profit entities to serve economically and socially disadvantaged populations through social service programs. The Pima County Board of Supervisors establishes funding limits for the program and grants are awarded to agencies through a public committee process.

42699-Thumbnail Image.jpg

Endangered Species Act and the Constitution

ContributorsBosselman, Fred P. (Author) / Pima County (Ariz.). County Administrator's Office (Publisher)
Created1999
Description
When we talk about Constitutional issues in relation to the Act, we are really asking is there a likelihood that it is unconstitutional in part or as applied to particular situations? The first risk is that some parts of it will be held to have been beyond the power of…

When we talk about Constitutional issues in relation to the Act, we are really asking is there a likelihood that it is unconstitutional in part or as applied to particular situations? The first risk is that some parts of it will be held to have been beyond the power of Congress to enact because they are not permissible exercises of the Interstate Commerce power. The second issue is the application of the Act to certain tracts of private property in a manner that would deprive that property of all beneficial use and constitute a taking of property. The third is that the mitigation demanded by the government as a condition for being allowed to take endangered species will exceed the power of government to demand because of a lack of a nexus in rough proportionality-- two tests that the Supreme Court has come up with in recent years.
42381-Thumbnail Image.png

Drug Court Annual Report: 2005 Calendar Year

ContributorsArizona. Superior Court (Pima County). Adult Probation Department (Author)
Created2006-02-06
Description

The Drug Court Team strive to provide the best probation services to participants, the court, and the community. This report also contains the results of a two-year Deferred Judgment outcome study.