Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

Annual Report (Pima County Small Business Commission)

ContributorsPima County (Ariz.). Small Business Commission (Author)
Created2010 to 2013
Description

The Commission was created in 2003. Each report briefly outlines the activities of the past year and the projects for the coming year.

Annual Report (Arizona Juvenile Court of Pima County)

ContributorsArizona. Juvenile Court (Pima County) (Author)
Created2003 to 2010
Description

We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted by the people to advance and protect the rule of law. We maintain jurisdiction over all children under the age of eighteen and their families who are referred to us for the fair and just resolution of disputes. Therefore, in accordance…

We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted by the people to advance and protect the rule of law. We maintain jurisdiction over all children under the age of eighteen and their families who are referred to us for the fair and just resolution of disputes. Therefore, in accordance with the due process of law, our mission is to promote and facilitate community safety through:
• The protection of abused and neglected children through the provision and oversight of services to children and families involved with the court.
• The restoration of victims, families, and the community.
• The reduction of delinquent behavior by holding juveniles accountable through a continuum of prevention, rehabilitation, and transition programs.
42699-Thumbnail Image.jpg

Endangered Species Act and the Constitution

ContributorsBosselman, Fred P. (Author) / Pima County (Ariz.). County Administrator's Office (Publisher)
Created1999
Description
When we talk about Constitutional issues in relation to the Act, we are really asking is there a likelihood that it is unconstitutional in part or as applied to particular situations? The first risk is that some parts of it will be held to have been beyond the power of…

When we talk about Constitutional issues in relation to the Act, we are really asking is there a likelihood that it is unconstitutional in part or as applied to particular situations? The first risk is that some parts of it will be held to have been beyond the power of Congress to enact because they are not permissible exercises of the Interstate Commerce power. The second issue is the application of the Act to certain tracts of private property in a manner that would deprive that property of all beneficial use and constitute a taking of property. The third is that the mitigation demanded by the government as a condition for being allowed to take endangered species will exceed the power of government to demand because of a lack of a nexus in rough proportionality-- two tests that the Supreme Court has come up with in recent years.