Matching Items (2)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

68413-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsGammage, Grady Jr. (Author) / Hallin, Bruce (Author) / Holway, Jim (Author) / Rossi, Terri Sue (Author) / Siegel, Rich (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2005-07
Description

The purpose of this paper is to consider alternative assured water supply approaches for Superstition Vistas and to describe potential methods of providing water service to the property. Because this paper represents a cursory analysis of the study area and available supplies, the results should only be used for scoping

The purpose of this paper is to consider alternative assured water supply approaches for Superstition Vistas and to describe potential methods of providing water service to the property. Because this paper represents a cursory analysis of the study area and available supplies, the results should only be used for scoping more detailed planning efforts. The first issue examined is whether sufficient water supplies exist regionally to support projected growth including Superstition Vistas. Additionally, estimated demands for the property are presented. Finally, there a number of issues that complicate the process of acquiring supplies for an area like Superstition Vistas. This paper summarizes some of those issues.

ContributorsArizona. State Land Department (Author)
Created2003 to 2016
Description

On May 20, 1912, an act of the First Legislature created the three-member State Land Commission to serve as the temporary Land Department of the State. They were charged with assessing, evaluating, and making recommendations about the land granted by Congress to the State for the Common Schools and other

On May 20, 1912, an act of the First Legislature created the three-member State Land Commission to serve as the temporary Land Department of the State. They were charged with assessing, evaluating, and making recommendations about the land granted by Congress to the State for the Common Schools and other institutions. The Commission was to report back to the Legislature with its findings and conclusions by the end of the second Legislative session. The Commission concluded that Arizona should not sell its Trust land out-right, as other states had done. Instead, it should put the lands to their "highest and best use." The decision to sell or lease the land should be based upon the potential use of each parcel. The Commission recommended the creation of a permanent State Land Department "... in order that the multitudinous detail attached to the State’s varied land interests may have constant attention and to prevent irretrievable loss."