Matching Items (9)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

68332-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2014-10
Description

Report takes a look at the pros and cons of three propositions that will be on the November 2014 ballot.
* Prop 122: a constitutional amendment to allow the Legislature to ignore any federal law or action they think is unconstitutional.
* Prop 304: would increase legislator's salaries to $35,000/year.
* Prop 303:

Report takes a look at the pros and cons of three propositions that will be on the November 2014 ballot.
* Prop 122: a constitutional amendment to allow the Legislature to ignore any federal law or action they think is unconstitutional.
* Prop 304: would increase legislator's salaries to $35,000/year.
* Prop 303: would permit a manufacturer to give or sell investigational drugs, biological products, and medical devices to terminally ill patients even though the FDA has not cleared them for general use.

Created1943-11-13
Description

Cordell Hull to Carl T. Hayden, November 13, 1943 re: Mexican water treaty.

Created1944-02-21
Description

John R. Murdock to Carl T. Hayden, February 21, 1944 re: Mexican water treaty.

Created1944-03-16
Description

Sidney P. Osborn to Franklin D. Roosevelt, March 16, 1944 re: Mexican water treaty.

Created1962-01-24
Description

Official report of proceedings before the Department of the Interior in the matter of Secretary's Conference re: Mexican water Treaty, January 24, 1962.

Created1962-01-11
Description

Carl T. Hayden to the Hon. Secretary of the Interior, January 11, 1962 re: Mexican Water Allocations.

Created1961-12-20
Description

Carl T. Hayden to Dean Rusk, December 20, 1961 re: Mexican Water Allocations.

68341-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2014-02-20
Description

The author writes about Arizona's longstanding belief in direct democracy via referendum, initiative and recall. The Legislature continues to grapple with election reform and strike a balance of how much binding authority should remain in the hands of voters in terms of initiative, referendum and recall, but Arizona’s penchant for

The author writes about Arizona's longstanding belief in direct democracy via referendum, initiative and recall. The Legislature continues to grapple with election reform and strike a balance of how much binding authority should remain in the hands of voters in terms of initiative, referendum and recall, but Arizona’s penchant for people power has been demonstrated since before statehood. In the midst of his campaign for Congress in 1911, for example, Arizona’s Carl Hayden noted that everywhere he went he found voters eager to take control. "The people want their own kind of government,” Hayden told reporters. “They want to be the dictators.”

68351-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2013-05
Description

Since statehood in 1912, Arizona has been among the nation’s leaders in using the initiative process to either adopt a statute or amend the state constitution by placing a measure on the ballot. But such efforts are anything but easy. In fact, organizers have found it to be an expensive,

Since statehood in 1912, Arizona has been among the nation’s leaders in using the initiative process to either adopt a statute or amend the state constitution by placing a measure on the ballot. But such efforts are anything but easy. In fact, organizers have found it to be an expensive, time-consuming and exhausting process – and one that is unlikely to end successfully.