Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

41791-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsArizona. Department of Commerce (Contributor)
Created2005-02
Description

This JLUS is Part Two of a Joint Land Use Study; Part One, for Luke Air Force Base Auxiliary Field #1, was completed in May 2004. This JLUS is part of the Arizona Military Regional Compatibility Project, a statewide endeavor to convene the stakeholders around each base--the relevant jurisdictions, base

This JLUS is Part Two of a Joint Land Use Study; Part One, for Luke Air Force Base Auxiliary Field #1, was completed in May 2004. This JLUS is part of the Arizona Military Regional Compatibility Project, a statewide endeavor to convene the stakeholders around each base--the relevant jurisdictions, base personnel, landowners, and other interested parties--to address land use compatibility issues

41790-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsArizona. Department of Commerce (Contributor)
Created2006-07
Description

This Policy Guidebook has been prepared under the Arizona Military Regional Compatibility Project, a proactive statewide endeavor to convene the stakeholders around each military installation--the relevant jurisdictions, military personnel, landowners, and other interested parties--to address land use compatibility issues.

43517-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMerrill, Bruce D. (Author) / Blanc, Tara A. (Author) / Arizona. Department of Commerce (Publisher)
Created2005-10-23
Description

The information in this report is based on telephone interviews with 700 registered voters. One random sample of 500 registered voters was selected from all registered voters living in Arizona. This sample was proportionately stratified so that voters in each of Arizona’s 15 counties were included in the sample. An

The information in this report is based on telephone interviews with 700 registered voters. One random sample of 500 registered voters was selected from all registered voters living in Arizona. This sample was proportionately stratified so that voters in each of Arizona’s 15 counties were included in the sample. An additional sample of 100 interviews with registered voters living in Pima County was also interviewed. A third random sample of 100 registered voters living in the more rural counties also was interviewed. The purpose of selecting the two smaller samples was to create sub-samples of Pima County and rural voters that could be compared with the opinions of voters in Maricopa County.