Matching Items (15)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

ContributorsDechter, Sara (Author) / Sarty, Stephanie (Author) / Mikelson, Jennifer (Author) / Donaldson, Clay (Author) / Flagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2015-11-12
Description

An update to the Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 (FRP30), to bring its Road Network Illustration (Map 25) into compliance with Arizona Revised Statute requirements and to resolve inconsistencies between Map 25 and parts of the Flagstaff City Code. This update does not alter the intent of FRP30; it is only

An update to the Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 (FRP30), to bring its Road Network Illustration (Map 25) into compliance with Arizona Revised Statute requirements and to resolve inconsistencies between Map 25 and parts of the Flagstaff City Code. This update does not alter the intent of FRP30; it is only concerned with correcting errors, removing legal vulnerability, and improving the readability of FRP30.

ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2000 to 2017
Description

A complete set of independently audited financial statements for the city of Flagstaff, Arizona.

ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2003 to 2017
Description

Includes a community profile, detailed statements of operating and capital improvement budgets, and discussion and analysis of budget policies and priorities.

ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created1998-01
Description

A plan for protecting and preserving existing open spaces in response to urban growth in the greater Flagstaff, Arizona area.

43385-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBrown, David Earl (Author) / Arizona Geological Survey (Publisher)
Created2007
Description

This report details geothermal resource exploration done for Arizona Public Service and the U.S. Department of Energy in 2005 to evaluate the geothermal resources of the Clifton Hot Springs area in Greenlee County, eastern Arizona for electric power production. The intent of the evaluation was to determine the local geologic

This report details geothermal resource exploration done for Arizona Public Service and the U.S. Department of Energy in 2005 to evaluate the geothermal resources of the Clifton Hot Springs area in Greenlee County, eastern Arizona for electric power production. The intent of the evaluation was to determine the local geologic controls of the geothermal system and, using publicly available data and original mapping performed for this project, to recommend locations for Controlled Source Audiomagnetotelluric (CSAMT) cross sections. The results of the geophysics were then combined with the geologic mapping to site three gradient holes, two of which were drilled to depths of 635 feet and 1,000 feet, respectively.

41518-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsDarton, Nelson Horatio (Author) / Fred Harvey (Publisher)
Created1917
DescriptionBooklet describing a geological survey of the Grand Canyon. Four editions: 1917, 1929, 1936, 1950.
41906-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2015-10-20
Description

A plan for reinvestment in the La Plaza Vieja neighborhood of Flagstaff, Arizona.

41905-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSaltonstall, John (Author) / Flagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2008-05-30
Description

Plan submitted for adoption by the Flagstaff City Council to alleviate motor vehicle congestion in the area known as the Lone Tree Corridor.

68503-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1998-11
Description

In spring 1998, 1,057 10th-grade students were surveyed as one component of a statewide evaluation of Arizona's school-to-work system designed by the Morrison Institute for Public Policy. This second survey measured attitudes toward and participation in career activities. Results were compared to baseline data collected from over 2,000 10th-grade students

In spring 1998, 1,057 10th-grade students were surveyed as one component of a statewide evaluation of Arizona's school-to-work system designed by the Morrison Institute for Public Policy. This second survey measured attitudes toward and participation in career activities. Results were compared to baseline data collected from over 2,000 10th-grade students in 1997. Data indicated that, in both years, nearly all students had at least an idea of their career area of interest; gender differences were observed in students' selections of career interests. Student participation in activities increased. Statistically significant differences in participation by sex were evident: more girls reported learning about careers in class and participating in volunteer activities; and more boys participated in internships with pay, worked for pay in a job unrelated to their careers, and had business mentors. The share of students who had selected a career interest increased as participation rose. All 14 activities were at least "somewhat" helpful to students in making career selections. In both years, students ranked family, teachers, and friends most highly as influencing career interests. One-fourth of students in 1998 compared to one-third of students in 1997 indicated they never received career guidance at school. Less than one-half of students were aware of courses related to career interests; even fewer actually took a course related to their interests.

68502-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1997-07
Description

One component of a multi-faceted evaluation of the state's STW initiative involves surveying tenth grade students. Thus, the survey was designed to assess the extent to which Arizona tenth grade students have selected career majors, planned a course of study for high school and beyond, and received adult guidance related

One component of a multi-faceted evaluation of the state's STW initiative involves surveying tenth grade students. Thus, the survey was designed to assess the extent to which Arizona tenth grade students have selected career majors, planned a course of study for high school and beyond, and received adult guidance related to careers. As part of the evaluation, the intent was to look at the extent to which career preparation and work experiences truly are system-wide and impact students. In contrast, the purpose was not to evaluate whether STW program participants are receiving school-based learning components.