Filtering by
- All Subjects: Bstan-ʼdzin-rgya-mtsho, Dalai Lama XIV, 1935-
- All Subjects: Economic conditions
- All Subjects: Parks
- Creators: Battelle Memorial Institute. Technology Partnership Practice
- Creators: Steele, A.T.
- Creators: Iverson, Peter
![41570-Thumbnail Image.jpg](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04/41570-Thumbnail%20Image.jpg?VersionId=5KbdZYR4AhIvgzn7z6yzsrfS.4tFzDUp)
![41577-Thumbnail Image.jpg](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04/41577-Thumbnail%20Image.jpg?VersionId=BBrtnPq8judzGe7_55XcxAI3t1jT2ram)
Pilgrims and officials leaving Dalai Lama's summer palace in Jewel Park, Lhasa after receiving his blessing.
![41578-Thumbnail Image.jpg](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04/41578-Thumbnail%20Image.jpg?VersionId=WdIQIIcGudlrnZSzXPVx2TEEKtaKY5xe)
The monk on left is the Lord Chamberlain, who handles the Dalai Lama's personal affairs and is one of the most influential monks in Tibet.
E48. The Father and brother of the Dalai Lama.
![42217-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04-27/42217-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=d0JGnXvQFwwDu_6ppAs3ePwORD4bprok)
Arizona State Parks must prepare a Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan every five years. This report is for 2003 through 2008. The primary purpose of this plan is to establish priorities for acquiring land and developing outdoor recreation facilities in Arizona.
Fort Lowell was a supply base for the United States Army “Apache Campaigns” between 1873 and 1891. Following abandonment of the fort in 1891, settlers moved in and used some fort buildings as residences, or stripped the buildings of useful materials. By the 1930s, much of the fort had fallen into disrepair or had been sold off. Eventually, the City of Tucson acquired a large portion of the old fort which became what is today’s “Fort Lowell Park.” A 5.2 acre (“Adkins”) parcel of the former fort containing several original adobe buildings was still in private ownership, and the 2004 County bond election passed a proposal to acquire the land and preserve the historic resources.
![43571-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04/43571-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=s9hyKTlsEOiJqgS.mNFcI3SWuigI5saO)
A landmark assessment of infrastructure needs in Arizona was produced by the L. William Seidman Research Institute in May 2008 for the Arizona Investment Council (AIC): "Infrastructure Needs and Funding Alternatives for Arizona: 2008-2032", that addressed infrastructure needs in four categories: energy, telecommunications, transportation, and water and wastewater. The information from the AIC report is a major input to the report that follows. Other types of infrastructure — most notably education, health care, and public safety — also are analyzed here to provide a more complete picture of infrastructure needs in Arizona. The goals of this report are to place Arizona’s infrastructure needs into national and historical contexts, to identify the changing conditions in infrastructure provision that make building Arizona’s infrastructure in the future a more problematic proposition than in the past, and to provide projections of the possible costs of providing infrastructure in Arizona over the next quarter century.
In this interview, Zah and Iverson discuss various political, economic, and controversial topics. Zah gives his impressions and thoughts about the Hopi government, including the struggle in trying to find the balance between traditional and progressive ideals. Zah also reflects on his positive relationship with Hopi chairman Ivan Sidney. The changes in Navajo politics, the Tribal Council, and chapter relationships are addressed, especially the 2010 vote for the reduction of the number of Council delegates from 88 to 24. Zah gives his overall assessment of the role of casino gaming in the Navajo economy. He goes into detail about the main issues that concerned and delayed the Navajo Nation in creating casinos. Zah lastly focuses on the Indian Civil Rights Act and the controversial confrontation that took place between Annie Wauneka and Ted Mitchell, which ultimately changed the ongoing leadership of DNA People’s Legal Services.