Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

42913-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsChandler (Ariz.) (Publisher)
Created2008-06
Description

The updated Chandler General Plan presents instructional guidance for coping with the consequences of approaching build-out. This document is not meant to be read from cover-to-cover in a single sitting. However, a user, whether a citizen appearing at a public hearing for the first time or a long-term City official,

The updated Chandler General Plan presents instructional guidance for coping with the consequences of approaching build-out. This document is not meant to be read from cover-to-cover in a single sitting. However, a user, whether a citizen appearing at a public hearing for the first time or a long-term City official, should become familiar with the Plan's content. A comprehensive planning view encourages the General Plan user to evaluate change on a Citywide basis, directing progress for the good of the community rather than special interests.

41918-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMaguire, Alan E. (Author) / Chandler (Ariz.) (Funder)
Created2013-10
Description

An analysis and review of the issues surrounding the city of Chandler's past and current planning and land use policies for the area.

43517-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMerrill, Bruce D. (Author) / Blanc, Tara A. (Author) / Arizona. Department of Commerce (Publisher)
Created2005-10-23
Description

The information in this report is based on telephone interviews with 700 registered voters. One random sample of 500 registered voters was selected from all registered voters living in Arizona. This sample was proportionately stratified so that voters in each of Arizona’s 15 counties were included in the sample. An

The information in this report is based on telephone interviews with 700 registered voters. One random sample of 500 registered voters was selected from all registered voters living in Arizona. This sample was proportionately stratified so that voters in each of Arizona’s 15 counties were included in the sample. An additional sample of 100 interviews with registered voters living in Pima County was also interviewed. A third random sample of 100 registered voters living in the more rural counties also was interviewed. The purpose of selecting the two smaller samples was to create sub-samples of Pima County and rural voters that could be compared with the opinions of voters in Maricopa County.