Matching Items (1,306)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

43460-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2006-08
Description

This strategic plan identifies the management direction that the Arizona Game and Fish Commission has provided to the Department for the next six years. The plan discusses the most important issues facing the Department, including the recruitment and retention of hunters, anglers and shooting sports participants, and explains how the

This strategic plan identifies the management direction that the Arizona Game and Fish Commission has provided to the Department for the next six years. The plan discusses the most important issues facing the Department, including the recruitment and retention of hunters, anglers and shooting sports participants, and explains how the Department plans to respond to those issues.

Prior strategic plans focused on just one of the programmatic areas for which the Department is responsible; for example, Wildlife 2006 was solely a wildlife strategic plan. In contrast, Wildlife 2012 provides strategic guidance for all programs within the Arizona Game and Fish Department. It emphasizes wildlife management, which is the Department’s primary focus. However, Wildlife 2012 also addresses off-highway vehicle and watercraft recreation beyond their impacts to wildlife resources, as well as the administration of the Department.

43461-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2004-08-25
Description

Identifying the primary managers of wildlife habitat can provide one useful type of information for development of Arizona’s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. This can contribute to satisfying at least three of the required elements: #4 (conservation actions and priorities), #5 (monitoring plans), and #7 (coordination). This can be particularly useful

Identifying the primary managers of wildlife habitat can provide one useful type of information for development of Arizona’s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. This can contribute to satisfying at least three of the required elements: #4 (conservation actions and priorities), #5 (monitoring plans), and #7 (coordination). This can be particularly useful in the prioritization of actions and resources.

Toward that end, The Nature Conservancy has compiled relevant information and conducted new analyses from our recent statewide efforts to map and analyze two natural communities, grasslands and forests, and a species group, native fish. The results are presented in three sections, with appendices describing data sources.

43462-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsArizona Game and Fish Department (Publisher)
Created2006-05-24
Description

Arizona’s CWCS is a document that plans for the conservation of species and their habitats. Working at large and small landscape scales, the plan first develops conservation actions to address stressors to habitats. This approach is meant to benefit all wildlife, including both vulnerable and common species, by managing for

Arizona’s CWCS is a document that plans for the conservation of species and their habitats. Working at large and small landscape scales, the plan first develops conservation actions to address stressors to habitats. This approach is meant to benefit all wildlife, including both vulnerable and common species, by managing for the habitat and resources upon which they depend. An example of this type of conservation action would be to identify important wildlife movement corridors and protecting them to minimize habitat fragmentation. To facilitate conservation of many species acting at different scales, Arizona’s CWCS uses a multi-scale approach to classifying habitat types within Arizona.

41220-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsEakin, J. R. (Author) / United States National Park Service (Publisher)
Created1924-03-05
Description

Press release comparing visitor attendance to the park by year. A 26 percent increase from 1923 to 1924 is noted.

41222-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHayden, Carl T. (Author)
Created1924-12-18
DescriptionTelegram from Carl Hayden to the Coconino Sun informing the paper that no funds for an approach road will be granted until the United States government owns Bright Angel Trail.
41223-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBreen, Fred S. (Contributor)
Created1924-12-07
Description

Letter from Fred Breen to Carl Hayden regarding the sale of Bright Angel Trail.

41224-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHayden, Carl T. (Author)
Created1924-12-16
Description

Letter from Carl Hayden to Fred S. Breen regarding Yaki Point, the sale of Bright Angel Trail and the building of a road between Maine and the Grand Canyon.

41225-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsGavin, J. E. (Author)
Created1924-09-04
Description

Letter from J. E. Gavin to Louis C. Cramton regarding the Bright Angel Trail controversy, including newspaper clipping.

41226-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMiami Daily Silver Belt (Publisher)
Created1924-10-25
Description

Rebuttal to the editoral published in the Coconino Sun attacking Ralph Cameron.

41228-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsThe Coconino Sun (Publisher)
Created1924-08-22
Description

Editoral attacking Senator Ralph Cameron for attempting to buy Bright Angel Trail.