Matching Items (11)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

Created2010 to 2013
Description

The Commission was created in 2003. Each report briefly outlines the activities of the past year and the projects for the coming year.

42737-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2000-04
Description

Builds upon the "Biological Stress Assessment" through the identification of threats and stressors to watercourses within Pima County. It provides background on technical and water policy matters, describes potential and existing impacts to watercourses within Pima County, suggests options for reducing stressors, and outlines a number of issues for discussion

Builds upon the "Biological Stress Assessment" through the identification of threats and stressors to watercourses within Pima County. It provides background on technical and water policy matters, describes potential and existing impacts to watercourses within Pima County, suggests options for reducing stressors, and outlines a number of issues for discussion withing each watershed planning unit.

42745-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2001-05
Description

Reviews the planning efforts and analyzes the existing background reports, master plans, and management plans of parks and preserves owned by Pima County. A comparison of the planning documents, natural and cultural resources, threats and stressors, inventories, monitoring and research activities is presented.

42624-Thumbnail Image.jpg
Created2001-06
Description

The purpose of this report is to summarize information relevant to water aspects of the SDCP and the Pima County Comprehensive Plan. It deals with water supply and human water demand, and water supplies and needs for riparian and wetland habitat.

68521-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMuro, Mark (Author) / Onaka, Jun (Author) / Melnick, Rob (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2002
Description

In February of 1998, the Pima County Board of Supervisors launched what has evolved into the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP) -- a comprehensive effort to protect the Sonoran Desert, guide growth and rationalize land development in the metropolitan Tucson region. Proponents of this planning process maintained that the project

In February of 1998, the Pima County Board of Supervisors launched what has evolved into the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP) -- a comprehensive effort to protect the Sonoran Desert, guide growth and rationalize land development in the metropolitan Tucson region. Proponents of this planning process maintained that the project would reconcile conflicts between human activities and conservation, providing benefits for both wildlife and economic development. Critics, however, have increasingly alleged that implementing such an initiative will adversely affect land and housing markets, increase taxes and create problems of housing affordability. Over time a pressing need has consequently grown for objective information about the possible fiscal and economic impacts of the conservation programs being assembled by Pima County. This report addresses that need. It is a tool in the form of an impartial framework for assessment that government officials, environmentalists, business people and the general public can use for debate and decision-making.

68495-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMuro, Mark (Author) / Melnick, Rob (Author) / Heffernon, Rick (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2002
Description

A series of 51 individual “stakeholder” interviews and two focus groups conducted with members of the Pima County business community in fall, 2001, documented significantly divided opinion about the likely economic impacts of the county’s Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP). The results of the stakeholder inquiries were striking. Only one

A series of 51 individual “stakeholder” interviews and two focus groups conducted with members of the Pima County business community in fall, 2001, documented significantly divided opinion about the likely economic impacts of the county’s Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan (SDCP). The results of the stakeholder inquiries were striking. Only one major finding reflected consensus, while several others revealed sharp differences of opinion in the business community about the potential economic impacts of the SDCP and associated initiatives.

96319-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1986-12-05
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss Maricopa County staff infighting/violations of state law, Proposition 200's impact on the Mecham administration, and an upcoming vote on Proposition 100 (land trades). Panelists include John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette; Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers; John Leach, Assistant City Editor, Arizona Republic.
96436-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1987-06-12
DescriptionPre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss county government redistricting and restructuring, gubernatorial legislative issues, and the cancer cluster in West Phoenix. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers; Kathleen Stanton, Environmental Reporter, New Times; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette.
96540-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1987-11-20
Description
Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss Governor Mecham's unreported campaign loan, failed attempts to pull Bob Corbin off the gubernatorial investigation, a political death threat, the St. Louis Cardinals' visit to the Valley, an ASU academics case involving a football player, and the District 6 runoff election. Panelists include Don Harris,

Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss Governor Mecham's unreported campaign loan, failed attempts to pull Bob Corbin off the gubernatorial investigation, a political death threat, the St. Louis Cardinals' visit to the Valley, an ASU academics case involving a football player, and the District 6 runoff election. Panelists include Don Harris, Political and Labor Writer, Arizona Republic; Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers; Richard de Uriarte, Editorial Writer, Phoenix Gazette.
96507-Thumbnail Image.jpg
ContributorsGrant, Michael, 1951- (Host) / Jennings, Max (Panelist) / Bommersbach, Jana (Panelist) / Kolbe, John W., 1940- (Panelist) / Public Broadcasting Service (Broadcaster)
Created1987-10-02
Description
Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss a controversial fundraising letter from the Mecham Finance Committee, potential gubernatorial candidates (Basha), and the upcoming Phoenix election. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers; Don Harris, Political and Labor Writer, Arizona Republic; Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix

Pre-recorded Friday Edition. Panelists discuss a controversial fundraising letter from the Mecham Finance Committee, potential gubernatorial candidates (Basha), and the upcoming Phoenix election. Panelists include Max Jennings, Executive Editor, Tribune Newspapers; Don Harris, Political and Labor Writer, Arizona Republic; Jana Bommersbach, Associate Editor, New Times; John Kolbe, Political Editor, Phoenix Gazette.