Matching Items (7)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

41251-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsPage, John H. (Author)
Created1910-08-09
Description

Letter from John H. Page regarding his right to build a railway between Grand Canyon Station and the Canyon Copper Company's mines and hotel.

41253-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsPage, John H. (Author)
Created1917-12-19
Description

Letter from John H. Page to Carl T. Hayden regarding his company's rights to build a railway if they choose to.

41256-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsPage, John H. (Author)
Created1917-11-21
Description

Letter from John Page to Carl T. Hayden regarding a conversation conducted at Hotel Adams in Phoenix. Page states his concern over the national park bill in reference to his mining company.

41268-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsPage, John H. (Author)
Created1917-02-03
Description

Letter from John Page to Carl Hayden concerning the future of property ownership within the proposed boundaries of the national park.

42081-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsFigueroa, Holly L. (Author) / Totura, Christine (Author) / Brien, Spencer (Author) / Wolfersteig, Wendy (Author) / RTI International (Publisher)
Created2014-06
Description

The Maricopa County Department of Public Health and the Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center at Arizona State University initiated an evaluation of ASU’s Tobacco-Free Campus policy, which went into effect on August 1, 2013. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the impacts of this policy on the ASU community

The Maricopa County Department of Public Health and the Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center at Arizona State University initiated an evaluation of ASU’s Tobacco-Free Campus policy, which went into effect on August 1, 2013. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the impacts of this policy on the ASU community and environment. This report summarizes tobacco consumption patterns, norms and perceptions surrounding tobacco use, tobacco litter on campus, and overall benefits of a tobacco-free campus both before and after policy implementation.

42090-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsFigueroa, Holly L. (Author) / Lynch, Ashley (Author) / Totura, Christine (Author) / Wolfersteig, Wendy (Author) / RTI International (Publisher)
Created2014-06
Description

In 2006, the Smoke-Free Arizona Act outlawed smoking within most enclosed public spaces and places of employment primarily to reduce the exposure of individuals to harmful secondhand smoke. The purpose of the Maricopa County Smoke-Free Parks Policy Assessment is three-fold: 1) to evaluate the extent and health impact of tobacco

In 2006, the Smoke-Free Arizona Act outlawed smoking within most enclosed public spaces and places of employment primarily to reduce the exposure of individuals to harmful secondhand smoke. The purpose of the Maricopa County Smoke-Free Parks Policy Assessment is three-fold: 1) to evaluate the extent and health impact of tobacco usage in public parks; 2) analyze smoke-free parks policies that have been proposed in cities, counties, and states nationwide; and 3) to assess the feasibility of introducing and implementing similar policies in Arizona, and in Maricopa County in particular.

42814-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2012-09
Description

The purpose of this report is to provide a proof of concept for a different, alternative method for evaluating police agencies. Our method is couched in a comparative approach, which will allow agencies to compare their performance to other police agencies. This report assesses police performance through the perceptions and

The purpose of this report is to provide a proof of concept for a different, alternative method for evaluating police agencies. Our method is couched in a comparative approach, which will allow agencies to compare their performance to other police agencies. This report assesses police performance through the perceptions and experiences of recently booked arrestees. By comparing the perceptions and experiences of recently booked arrestees from different jurisdictions we can begin to contextualize results and observe differences that might serve as an early warning of a problem or serve as an indicator of success.