Matching Items (13)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

41157-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1926-04-02
DescriptionGrand Canyon National Park General Regulations.
41104-Thumbnail Image.png
DescriptionBooklet with description of the Grand Canyon. Circa 1915.
41491-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1929
Description

Typescript report, black and white, describing the mammals of Grand Canyon National Park with cover drawing of a bighorn sheep.

41490-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1930
Description

Typescript report, black and white, describing the birds of Grand Canyon National Park with cover drawing of a bald eagle.

41489-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1927-08-31
DescriptionMonthly bulletin, black and white, describing the natural history and scientific features of Grand Canyon National Park with cover drawing of fern bush.
41488-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1929-02-28
DescriptionMonthly bulletin, black and white, describing the natural history and scientific features of Grand Canyon National Park. This volume is dedicated in memoriam to Glen E. Sturdevant, park naturalist, and Fred Johnson, park ranger, who drowned while collecting specimens in the park.
41487-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1928-07-31
Description

Handwritten cover titled, "Nature Notes of Grand Canyon, Polyphemus Moth, Female, Found at Grand Canyon, 5 July 1928, Vol. 3 - No. 2." Cover includes a drawing of the moth.

42592-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMuro, Mark (Author) / The Pride Publishing Company (Publisher)
Created2002
Description

A number of significant positive and negative economic impacts could result from Pima County's SDCP and related programs, according to an analysis of existing research on large-scale conservation planning undertaken to provide a framework for community decision-making. This report offers no final verdict on the net economic impact of Pima

A number of significant positive and negative economic impacts could result from Pima County's SDCP and related programs, according to an analysis of existing research on large-scale conservation planning undertaken to provide a framework for community decision-making. This report offers no final verdict on the net economic impact of Pima County's current, ambitious initiatives in habitat conservation and growth management. However, it does provide a framework for future assessment and decision-making.

42591-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMuro, Mark (Author) / The Pride Publishing Company (Publisher)
Created2002
Description

A series of 51 individual stakeholder interviews and two focus groups conducted with members of the Pima County business community in fall, 2001, documented significantly divided opinion about the likely economic impacts of the county's SDCP. Only one major finding reflected consensus, while several others revealed sharp differences of opinion.

68421-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsMurray, Matthew (Author) / Borns, Kristin (Author) / Clark-Johnson, Sue (Author) / Muro, Mark (Author) / Vey, Jennifer (Author) / Brookings Mountain West (Publisher) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2011-01
Description

Though the Great Recession may be officially over, all is not well in Arizona. Three years after the collapse of a massive real estate “bubble,” the deepest economic downturn in memory exposed and exacerbated one of the nation’s most profound state fiscal crises, with disturbing implications for Arizona citizens and

Though the Great Recession may be officially over, all is not well in Arizona. Three years after the collapse of a massive real estate “bubble,” the deepest economic downturn in memory exposed and exacerbated one of the nation’s most profound state fiscal crises, with disturbing implications for Arizona citizens and the state’s long-term economic health.

This brief takes a careful look at the Grand Canyon State’s fiscal situation, examining both Arizona’s serious cyclical budget shortfall—the one resulting from a temporary collapse of revenue due to the recession—as well as the chronic, longer-term, and massive structural imbalances that have developed largely due to policy choices made in better times. This primer employs a unique methodology to estimate the size of the state’s structural deficit and then explores the mix of forces, including the large permanent tax reductions, that created them. It also highlights some of the dramatic impacts these fiscal challenges are having on service-delivery as well as on local governments. The brief suggests some of the steps state policymakers must take to close their budget gaps over the short and longer term. First, it urges better policymaking, and prods leaders to broaden, balance, and diversify the state’s revenue base while looking to assure a long-haul balance of taxing and spending. And second, it recommends that Arizona improve the information-sharing and budgeting processes through which fiscal problems are understood—so they may ultimately be averted.