Matching Items (38)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

41883-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Contributor)
Created2012
Description

A plan to redevelop the 4th Avenue and 16th Street corridors as defined in the City of Yuma's 2012 general plan.

41884-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2009
Description

A plan to revitalize the 215 acre Yuma High Neighborhood, to improve substandard housing conditions, encourage small business development and job creation, and improve community facilities.

41885-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2007
Description

A plan for the development and maintenance of the city of Yuma's roadway system, consistent with the city's 2002 general plan, and coordinated with the city's bicycle plan and the Yuma Metropolitan Planning Organization's regional transportation plan.

41887-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2006
Description

Provides a plan for the development of park and recreation facilities in Yuma, Arizona to serve its residents and others in the surrounding area.

ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2012-06-06
Description

A policy document and guide for the growth and development of the city of Yuma in the next 10-20 years.

41891-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2002
Description

A policy document and guide for the growth and development of the city of Yuma in the next 10-20 years.

68364-Thumbnail Image.png
Created1996-07
Description

Between May and July of 1996, members of the council were asked to participate in a series of interviews. The primary purpose of the interviews was to elicit council members' views of and expectations for Arizona's STW initiative. A second reason was to clarify the mission of the council itself.

Between May and July of 1996, members of the council were asked to participate in a series of interviews. The primary purpose of the interviews was to elicit council members' views of and expectations for Arizona's STW initiative. A second reason was to clarify the mission of the council itself. This paper highlights salient points from the interviews. Quotes are used verbatim.

68523-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsVandegrift, Judith A. (Author) / Wright, Joel (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created1998-11
Description

In the spring of 1998, the Office of Workforce Development Policy (OWDP) of the Arizona Department of Commerce commissioned a statewide opinion poll to assess public attitudes toward the state’s plan for economic development as implemented through GSPED — the Governor’s Strategic Partnership for Economic Development. The poll was designed

In the spring of 1998, the Office of Workforce Development Policy (OWDP) of the Arizona Department of Commerce commissioned a statewide opinion poll to assess public attitudes toward the state’s plan for economic development as implemented through GSPED — the Governor’s Strategic Partnership for Economic Development. The poll was designed to assess both the public’s understanding of GSPED and their reactions to using the concept of industry clusters as a tool for organizing both economic and workforce development efforts.

One question posed by members of the Governors’ Council on Workforce Development Policy pertained
to whether polling results vary by urban versus rural residency. Specifically, the question was raised as to whether the responses of rural residents differ from those who live in urban areas. Therefore, at the request of the Council, results of the polling were analyzed in order to answer the question: Does urban versus rural residency affect respondents' answers? The answer to this question is, in short, No.

68524-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsVandegrift, Judith A. (Author) / Wright, Joel (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created1998-11
Description

In the spring of 1998, the Office of Workforce Development Policy (OWDP) of the Arizona Department of Commerce commissioned a statewide opinion poll to assess public attitudes toward the state’s plan for economic development as implemented through GSPED — the Governor’s Strategic Partnership for Economic Development. The poll was designed

In the spring of 1998, the Office of Workforce Development Policy (OWDP) of the Arizona Department of Commerce commissioned a statewide opinion poll to assess public attitudes toward the state’s plan for economic development as implemented through GSPED — the Governor’s Strategic Partnership for Economic Development. The poll was designed to assess both the public’s understanding of GSPED and their reactions to using the concept of industry clusters as a tool for organizing both economic and workforce development efforts.

68528-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsVandegrift, Judith A. (Author) / Greene, Andrea (Contributor) / Sandler, Linda (Contributor) / Bierlein, Louann (Contributor) / Dickey, Linda (Contributor) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created1994-09
Description

In preparation for new federal legislation that promotes unprecedented levels of comprehensive planning and service integration at state and local levels, an analysis of state issues relevant to comprehensive service delivery is necessary. This paper examines such state issues, with a focus on Arizona's at-risk population, and presents a framework

In preparation for new federal legislation that promotes unprecedented levels of comprehensive planning and service integration at state and local levels, an analysis of state issues relevant to comprehensive service delivery is necessary. This paper examines such state issues, with a focus on Arizona's at-risk population, and presents a framework for comprehensive service delivery. It provides the rationale for such service delivery, summarizes the literature on research-based practices, illustrates district approaches to comprehensive service delivery, and sets forth guidelines for developing a comprehensive plan. System components of an effective plan are discussed in detail--student education, parent/family involvement, social/economic services, health services, and professional development. Five general principles underlie success: philosophy, people, processes, promising practices, and partners. Recommendations for developing comprehensive service delivery programs include the following: (1) build on existing information; (2) consolidate knowledge; and (3) think long-term. Contains 11 figures and over 250 references. Appendices contain information on Arizona practitioners' views and an illustration of a side-by-side program analysis.