Matching Items (6)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

67468-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1964
Description

Draft of report published in A.H. Schroeder, 1965, Anthropological Papers of the Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Misc. Coll. Papers 75; 10: 85-110. Pilot study of 3 pollen samples suggests pollen chronology developed for Northern Arizona and New Mexico portions of the Colorado Plateau not applicable to SE Utah.

67413-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1974
Description

Unpublished report, 1974.

Summary of the observations and conclusions drawn from pollen studies of surface samples, core samples from Calimus Lake.

67405-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1971
DescriptionResults of pilot pollen study suggests further research would be relevant to on-going and planned archaeological study at this site. Also see unpublished report of subsequent palynological research 1974.
67395-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1967
DescriptionPaper presented as an invited lecture to graduate students in Botany at Arizona State University. Discusses the history and outcomes of Quaternary pollen studies in the desert Southwest of the United States.
67375-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1964
Description

Unpublished report, 1964

Pilot study of 3 pollen samples allows vegetation pattern reconstruction for period of occupation and suggests successful maize farming required water control technology.

67439-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1981
Description

Argues that the canons of evidence that apply to artifactual evidence of prehistoric behavior patterns are sometimes distinct from those that apply to non-artifactual evidence, and the logic and archaeological value of the latter is not less simply because it is different. The essay is intended to instruct and sensitise

Argues that the canons of evidence that apply to artifactual evidence of prehistoric behavior patterns are sometimes distinct from those that apply to non-artifactual evidence, and the logic and archaeological value of the latter is not less simply because it is different. The essay is intended to instruct and sensitise archaeologists to this issue as much as it is to allay concern that the pollen evidence for Archaic maize cultivation at the Koster site may not be credible. 49 p. Also see Schoenwetter 1994