Matching Items (10)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Museum of New Mexico. Laboratory of Anthropology
- All Subjects: Palynology California
- All Subjects: Pottery dating
- All Subjects: Cultural relations
- Creators: Schoenwetter, James
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1987
DescriptionDiscussion of Pollen Studies in Mitigation Context at Prado Dam.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author) / Buge, David E. (Author)
Created1972
DescriptionPollen associated with the San Dieguito I assemblage recovered at this site seems to be either of an earlier Pleistocene deposit on which the tools rest or a deposit incorporating a modern desert pollen spectrum.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1976
Description
Study of the pollen of 4 surface and 41 stratigraphic and archaeological-context sediment samples was undertaken to provide independent evidence of the antiquity of sites LA 11828 and LA 11904, and of the hypothesis the two sites had the same cultural functions. The pollen record suggests the two sites differ in antiquity: the occupation horizon samples from LA 11828 correspond to others that date to the Historic Period, while those from LA 11904 correspond to others that date 1800 - 300 B.C. Palynological differences that are probably indices of seasonality of occupation argue for the sites having different cultural functions.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1961
Description
Abstract of paper presented to the American Ethnological Society, 1961. Subsequently published in the "Journal of East Asian Studies." Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 15-20.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1965
DescriptionUnpublished report, 1965
Discusses local vegetation patterns, modern pollen/vegetation relationships, pollen sequence and chronology for the site, correspondence of ceramic-dated pollen horizons at this site with those elsewhere in the SW, cultural ecological implications of the pollen record, and plant resource availability during prehistoric occupation.
Discusses local vegetation patterns, modern pollen/vegetation relationships, pollen sequence and chronology for the site, correspondence of ceramic-dated pollen horizons at this site with those elsewhere in the SW, cultural ecological implications of the pollen record, and plant resource availability during prehistoric occupation.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1965
Description
Unpublished report, 1965.
Study of pollen samples from these two Reeve Phase sites was undertaken excluding Cheno-am and Compositae pollen from the pollen sum. Cross-dating suggests a five-horizon pollen sequence; three horizons are evidenced a both sites, the other two are from samples superimosed on the occupation floors of rooms. Dates between A.D. 1375 and 1490 are suggested for the sequence. Also discusses economically significant pollen types and presents cultural ecological interpretations. Published 1973
Study of pollen samples from these two Reeve Phase sites was undertaken excluding Cheno-am and Compositae pollen from the pollen sum. Cross-dating suggests a five-horizon pollen sequence; three horizons are evidenced a both sites, the other two are from samples superimosed on the occupation floors of rooms. Dates between A.D. 1375 and 1490 are suggested for the sequence. Also discusses economically significant pollen types and presents cultural ecological interpretations. Published 1973
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1965
Description
Unpublished report, 1965.
Eight surface pollen samples and 41 subsurface samples from 4 archaeological sites were analyzed as part of a Laboratory of Anthropology.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Author)
Created1965
Description
Pilot study of 9 pollen samples to assess pollen preservation, potential to aid stratigraphic analysis, and recognition of environmental changes.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Contributor)
Created1965
DescriptionStudy of 8 pollen samples for vegetation reconstruction and site dating.
ContributorsSchoenwetter, James (Contributor)
Created1967
DescriptionPollen records from 1 surface and 3 archaeological-context samples suggest the two BM II sites are not contemporaneous.