Matching Items (22)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

42548-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2009-08-28
Description

This report examines how effectively Pima County’s natural open-space acquisitions have addressed priorities for conserving species’ habitats and landscape features identified in the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. The scope of this study is beyond the County's Multi-Species Conservation Plan, which is a subset of the overall Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan.

42549-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2009-08-28
Description

The purpose of this study is to provide the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service with an analysis that identifies anticipated impacts to each of the covered species and asks the question: How effectively will the County's mitigation lands include the specific habitats of covered species under the Multi-Species Conservation Plan?

42550-Thumbnail Image.png
Created2009-01
Description

Develops the methods for using the National Land Cover Dataset to report change by jurisdictions and land ownership by utilizing an existing dataset. Local GIS-based measures of development based on tax assessor records do not provide direct measures of habitat loss.

ContributorsDechter, Sara (Author) / Sarty, Stephanie (Author) / Mikelson, Jennifer (Author) / Donaldson, Clay (Author) / Flagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2015-11-12
Description

An update to the Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 (FRP30), to bring its Road Network Illustration (Map 25) into compliance with Arizona Revised Statute requirements and to resolve inconsistencies between Map 25 and parts of the Flagstaff City Code. This update does not alter the intent of FRP30; it is only

An update to the Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 (FRP30), to bring its Road Network Illustration (Map 25) into compliance with Arizona Revised Statute requirements and to resolve inconsistencies between Map 25 and parts of the Flagstaff City Code. This update does not alter the intent of FRP30; it is only concerned with correcting errors, removing legal vulnerability, and improving the readability of FRP30.

41905-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsSaltonstall, John (Author) / Flagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2008-05-30
Description

Plan submitted for adoption by the Flagstaff City Council to alleviate motor vehicle congestion in the area known as the Lone Tree Corridor.

41906-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2015-10-20
Description

A plan for reinvestment in the La Plaza Vieja neighborhood of Flagstaff, Arizona.

ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created1998-01
Description

A plan for protecting and preserving existing open spaces in response to urban growth in the greater Flagstaff, Arizona area.

ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2000 to 2017
Description

A complete set of independently audited financial statements for the city of Flagstaff, Arizona.

ContributorsFlagstaff (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2003 to 2017
Description

Includes a community profile, detailed statements of operating and capital improvement budgets, and discussion and analysis of budget policies and priorities.

43279-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsHasty, Brian W. (Author) / Humble, Will (Author) / Arizona. Office of Environmental Health (Author)
Created2004-03-19
Description

In August 2001, a resident of New River contacted the Arizona Department of Health Services, Office of Environmental Health to request information on the health risks of arsenic in drinking water. The resident collected two well water samples and submitted them to a private laboratory for arsenic analysis. The analyses

In August 2001, a resident of New River contacted the Arizona Department of Health Services, Office of Environmental Health to request information on the health risks of arsenic in drinking water. The resident collected two well water samples and submitted them to a private laboratory for arsenic analysis. The analyses detected arsenic at 560 and 600 μg/L. To confirm these very high arsenic results, ADHS staff sampled the well for arsenic and submitted the samples for analysis by the ADHS State Laboratory. Arsenic was detected at 340 μg/L. After that, a large number of people requested health advice on arsenic in their well water. This public health consultation primarily evaluates arsenic levels found in private wells and documents health advice provided to well owners. When other metals were found at levels of concern, health advice was provided to well owners regarding exposure to those metals too.