Filtering by
- All Subjects: Arizona
- Creators: Arizona. Office of Environmental Health
- Creators: Arizona. Department of Economic Security
- Creators: Arizona Judicial Council (1990). Commission on Minorities in the Judiciary
- Creators: Gilbert (Ariz.)
![41925-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04-27/41925-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=MrAlvzw3yYJM8yiHM81JZqARAxl5SxdT)
Outlines Gilbert's community goals for its physical, economic, and social development and provides a decision-making guide for the future.
The plan identifies and prioritizes any and all known and future capital needs of the community which are to be constructed with public funds.
The budget includes a profile of Gilbert and its government, a financial overview, details of operating and non-operating funds, capital improvement, and the town's debt.
While the economic environment in Arizona has gradually improved, vulnerable individuals and families rely on the Department for life-saving protective services and essential economic support. The Department has made important improvements in how we deliver benefits, goods and services to vulnerable individuals and families. The Plan outlines several of these on-going improvement efforts including cost-saving process improvements, expanded community collaborations, enhanced transparency and increased accountability.
In preparing the report, the Department of Economic Security consulted with the Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence. The reporting system provides information on the population served, the types and usage of the services provided within the shelter, and the unmet needs of persons receiving shelter.
![43202-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-06-16/43202-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=3DdhOx6e43PMTyrKqOt5nHoacAgWmFXS)
The conference looked beyond the juvenile justice system proper to examine the roots and potential solutions to the over representation of minority youth in Arizona’s juvenile justice system. Through this important undertaking and the dedication of the Commission on Minorities, Arizona demonstrated once again its important role as a leader in shaping the future of the juvenile justice system.
![43203-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04/43203-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=MGs6sAHAvtktqa7M4ERXNLOaEQJQcDRD)
![43204-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04/43204-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=gic1qfRfX4z0Ns14mwTC9mZU_xiNfOh2)
Shortly after selecting Judge Roxanne Song Ong as Commission Chair and reconstituting its membership, Chief Justice McGregor directed the Commission to develop a strategic plan with projects that seek to enhance fairness and equity in the judiciary and present a report at the December 2006 meeting of the Arizona Judicial Council.
![43205-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/prism/s3fs-public/2021-04/43205-Thumbnail%20Image.png?VersionId=Wo820mmk7Q75ZD_0CYgDxmjk31OWx.I8)
This report represent the efforts of the Commission since its reactivation under a new mandate in May of 1994. The goal of this work group is to develop policies and programs that will facilitate the growth of minority applicants seeking appointments as judges, commissioners, judges pro tempore, special masters, clerkships, and internships.
This report is a result of the "2002 Equitable Treatment of Minority Youth" report produced by the Arizona Supreme Court Commission on Minorities in the Judiciary. One of the recommendations issued in that report was to create an annual report card to assess progress on the reduction of over-representation of minority youth in the juvenile justice system. The decision has been modified to produce a report card every other year. The first report serves as a baseline for the second, third and fourth report cards. The intent is to illustrate the current situation, provide a basis for future comparison, highlight areas of special concern and compare these results with the prior report card.