Matching Items (18)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

41883-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Contributor)
Created2012
Description

A plan to redevelop the 4th Avenue and 16th Street corridors as defined in the City of Yuma's 2012 general plan.

41884-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2009
Description

A plan to revitalize the 215 acre Yuma High Neighborhood, to improve substandard housing conditions, encourage small business development and job creation, and improve community facilities.

41885-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2007
Description

A plan for the development and maintenance of the city of Yuma's roadway system, consistent with the city's 2002 general plan, and coordinated with the city's bicycle plan and the Yuma Metropolitan Planning Organization's regional transportation plan.

41887-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2006
Description

Provides a plan for the development of park and recreation facilities in Yuma, Arizona to serve its residents and others in the surrounding area.

ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2012-06-06
Description

A policy document and guide for the growth and development of the city of Yuma in the next 10-20 years.

41891-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsYuma (Ariz.) (Author)
Created2002
Description

A policy document and guide for the growth and development of the city of Yuma in the next 10-20 years.

68332-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2014-10
Description

Report takes a look at the pros and cons of three propositions that will be on the November 2014 ballot.
* Prop 122: a constitutional amendment to allow the Legislature to ignore any federal law or action they think is unconstitutional.
* Prop 304: would increase legislator's salaries to $35,000/year.
* Prop 303:

Report takes a look at the pros and cons of three propositions that will be on the November 2014 ballot.
* Prop 122: a constitutional amendment to allow the Legislature to ignore any federal law or action they think is unconstitutional.
* Prop 304: would increase legislator's salaries to $35,000/year.
* Prop 303: would permit a manufacturer to give or sell investigational drugs, biological products, and medical devices to terminally ill patients even though the FDA has not cleared them for general use.

68338-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2014-03
Description

Dark money. The name itself carries ominous undertones, undertones that critics of this relatively new campaign-finance phenomenon claim reflect a genuine threat to democracy. Its defenders, on the other hand, argue that the dark money approach to funding political campaigns is merely an extension of Americans’ basic right to free

Dark money. The name itself carries ominous undertones, undertones that critics of this relatively new campaign-finance phenomenon claim reflect a genuine threat to democracy. Its defenders, on the other hand, argue that the dark money approach to funding political campaigns is merely an extension of Americans’ basic right to free speech. In other words, the issues at hand could hardly be more profound.

68341-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2014-02-20
Description

The author writes about Arizona's longstanding belief in direct democracy via referendum, initiative and recall. The Legislature continues to grapple with election reform and strike a balance of how much binding authority should remain in the hands of voters in terms of initiative, referendum and recall, but Arizona’s penchant for

The author writes about Arizona's longstanding belief in direct democracy via referendum, initiative and recall. The Legislature continues to grapple with election reform and strike a balance of how much binding authority should remain in the hands of voters in terms of initiative, referendum and recall, but Arizona’s penchant for people power has been demonstrated since before statehood. In the midst of his campaign for Congress in 1911, for example, Arizona’s Carl Hayden noted that everywhere he went he found voters eager to take control. "The people want their own kind of government,” Hayden told reporters. “They want to be the dictators.”

68351-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsBerman, David R. (Author) / Morrison Institute for Public Policy (Publisher)
Created2013-05
Description

Since statehood in 1912, Arizona has been among the nation’s leaders in using the initiative process to either adopt a statute or amend the state constitution by placing a measure on the ballot. But such efforts are anything but easy. In fact, organizers have found it to be an expensive,

Since statehood in 1912, Arizona has been among the nation’s leaders in using the initiative process to either adopt a statute or amend the state constitution by placing a measure on the ballot. But such efforts are anything but easy. In fact, organizers have found it to be an expensive, time-consuming and exhausting process – and one that is unlikely to end successfully.