Matching Items (5)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Gay rights
- Creators: The Pride Publishing Company
- Creators: Arizona. Department of Commerce
ContributorsThe Pride Publishing Company (Contributor)
Created1977-12-15
DescriptionSelected articles: Canadians Take To
The Streets; Gay Athletes Fight Anita; CCR; Book Reviews; Homosexual rignt that used boys cracked; 15 held
The Streets; Gay Athletes Fight Anita; CCR; Book Reviews; Homosexual rignt that used boys cracked; 15 held
ContributorsThe Pride Publishing Company (Contributor)
Created1978-02
DescriptionSelected article titles: On Gay Marches…; Anita Bryant in Tucson Feb. 20; A Day Without Human Rights, Is Like a Day Without Sunshine; Prof Says Gay Males Wed Women for 'Self-respect'; Book Reviews
ContributorsThe Pride Publishing Company (Contributor)
Created1978-04-15
DescriptionSelected article titles: Sterling Gruver Assumes CCR Directorship; Sterling's Notes…On Gay Community Service Centers; On Top with George Hill; How Much Do You Know about the Gay Rights Issue?; CCR Bake Sale at Club Phoenix
ContributorsThe Pride Publishing Company (Contributor)
Created1978-05-18
DescriptionSelected article titles: Lesbian Mother Awarded Custody; A Dragon Lives Forever…The Pride Interviews Dragon Lady and Alter-ego, Tom Clark; Black's Beach; St. Paul, Wichita Voters Ax Civil Rights for Gays; Coors Beer Boycott to Continue
ContributorsMerrill, Bruce D. (Author) / Blanc, Tara A. (Author) / Arizona. Department of Commerce (Publisher)
Created2005-10-23
Description
The information in this report is based on telephone interviews with 700 registered voters. One random sample of 500 registered voters was selected from all registered voters living in Arizona. This sample was proportionately stratified so that voters in each of Arizona’s 15 counties were included in the sample. An additional sample of 100 interviews with registered voters living in Pima County was also interviewed. A third random sample of 100 registered voters living in the more rural counties also was interviewed. The purpose of selecting the two smaller samples was to create sub-samples of Pima County and rural voters that could be compared with the opinions of voters in Maricopa County.